Random Thoughts.....What Are You Thinking?

You're the one who brought up dev income from gamepass subscriptions.

gamepass is great for low budget indie devs, its great for AA+ games that are 5++ years old. Its *** horrible for brand new games to be released on subscription services like gamepass.

Revenue is not profit. Afaik MS only published revenue data not profit.

I tried to find profit margin for this particular services but I haven't found any data yet. Do you have data?

I don't make assumptions unless I see the data.

And let's say even if MS is massively profiting from Game Pass, why is that negative? I still don't understand.



The situation that Game pass is the only option for publishing games don't exist, what's the point to discuss it? Honestly if you are afraid of platform monopoly, Steam has FAR higher chance to become monopoly than Game Pass. The difference aren't even close.

The idea that people spam negativity on MS despite Steam is the absolute winner here also doesn't make sense.


But there ARE people who consume games very fast and they just aren't buying 5 $70 games per month. And sub services makes it possible for them to rotate games faster.

So again, why negative? If there are no market need for this then sub service will die. If there is a market need then why can't sub service exist for these people?

It's not like game dev's freedom to sell games on Steam is taken away by MS.

Yeah, I made it clear that old model wasn't fair for AAA dev on day one. So MS increases highest price tier to reflect that unfairness?

If game dev putting AAA games on game pass day one is net loss, then game dev wouldn't do it. Since they have alternatives platforms to sell games.

If MS increases sub price and use extra money to negotiate better deals with AAA dev then AAA dev got more on game pass.

If MS just keep those money and not giving them to AAA dev they'll refuse to sell their games on game pass day one because they lose profit. Then MS will lose high tier sub without large amount of AAA
games on day one.

I am still not sure why is this negative. To me it's just market functioning as it is. Then people put negative spins on it because they emotionally dislike MS or something.

Why would a company create and run a service that makes it no profit.

I mean.. are you sure you know how capitalism works?

When that service starts charging way too much for what it provides, according to consumers, consumers will stop paying for it. Again should be obvious.

I didn't say "MS didn't make profit". I only said what matter to me in a profit discussion is the actual number, not "a lot money" kind of description. How much is "a lot of money" exactly?

It's a comment on choice of word, not a statement about MS's profit.

Also by your own logic, who would make choices with no profit? Maybe those game devs who decided to release their games on Game pass are actually profiting from it, otherwise by logic they wouldn't do it. Why are you worrying about other people's marketing choice lol.



Well duh, if you think the highest price tier is too expensive, then you are not their target audience then.

Their highest price tier target audience are people who would like to play multiple AAA games on day one and finish them really fast. Not you.

The one that drops sub due to price increase aren't MS's target audience for high tier, and I am pretty sure MS knew this 100% before they made the decision too.

The slim chance their game is an absolute banger and people go out of their way to buy a standalone copy to support the company that made the game.

see Clair Obscur, which was released on gamepass.

I have a rl question. Do grown ups pay for Gamepass or the PS equivalent? Honestly. Because I can see kids wanting Gamepass then playing one game a month.

A lot more, relative to what they pay game devs for access to their game library. MS doesn't publish profit numbers.

How do I know it's more? Because they offer the service to make money.

I know grown ups that pay for game pass because it used to be pretty cheap and gave you access to lots of games.

I always thought it's a scam and if I want to play a game I just buy it.

On average, I finish 1 game every 3-7 days. If it's rpg then it's one game every 2-3 weeks.

If I have game pass sub active, then I don't even finish one game fully. I just play one game for an hour or two to experience the game system, then move on to the next game for the next system.

Also I do buy tons of games despite I find game pass useful, my monthly spending on buying single player game last year was about 250% higher than average console gamer according to data. So it's not like sub service stop me from buying games. It help me rotate games and experience them faster that's all.

My problem with buying games is that, paying a full price for a game make me feel like I need to finish it. So it reduces my efficiency on experiencing and learning different game systems. Using game pass actually increases my efficiency for me.

Also if you are a streamer, you probably would rotate games this fast too. It's literally their job to play games 6+ hr a day and stream trendy games for traffic.

ironic you state this, since there are many services and top 500 companies that lose money on these "services" purely to keep the company profitable in other ways lol

Many reasons. Publicity. As a charity or charitable contribution. To collect salable data. To funnel people, or merely their clicks, to moneymaking parts of the company / service.

That's from 30 seconds of thought. Try thinking on the subject for a bit. You will find more.

I currently buy the
-nintendo family version for us
-buy Xbox ultimate service for 24 year old daughter (since she loves the games and does a lot of new xbox console gaming and laptop gaming)
-Buy the normal tier PS+ for 21 year old son since he doesn't do all the classic nostalgia crap wife and I do for below plan
-Buy the top tier 140/year PS service for wife since she is disabled and loves to play all the random old games it provides
-I sneak some playtime on Ninja Gaiden Sigma on her playstation plus since it can stream and make me smile, and is free to stream with her super bundle etc but I cant justify wasting 140/year getting that crap again for myself playing an hour a month lol

it's a gaming house so they all do a lot of gaming outside their respective full time roles.

MS are not a charity.

Come on people, let's be real.

Yes, you are right, there are several reasons a company would continue to prop up a service or product that makes no profit.

None apply to gamepass.

Unless either of you have any reasons to suggest why MS would increase prices other than to make profit.

Alfania triple posted on you guys.

That sucks

Loss leaders exist for a reason. No ones doubting that there are products that exist to be sold for a strategic loss.

The console itself is the loss leader so they can profit off the games they sell. Without the console, no ones buying any games, since they need the console to play said games.

However, Gamepass is not one of them, nor should it be.

So.... according to this logic game pass weren't profitable before then?

Come on, LOGICALLY letting players play $70 games on first day for $10 isn't going to be profitable. You'll just get a bunch of people play on game pass day one and not buying.

That's why a lot of companies don't put their AAA games on XGP day one, because they knew they are losing money.

If MS wants more dev to put their games on XGP day one they'll have to pay them with a better deal, and that money comes from high tier sub.

So why is people being negative about the whole thing? I legitimately don't understand lol.

Putting out a service at a low low un-profitable price then hiking up price when it becomes popular is definitely right out of MS handbook.

Why are you defending MS. I don't understand.

It's their call to hike prices. Everyone else's not to buy it.

Saying "it's good for industry" is so far out there you might as well give your wallet to MS and say "have at it".

I said it's good for consumers.

Why am I defending for MS? I explained in my last post. I play a lot of games to experience game systems and Game Pass increases my efficiency.


For me time is money, and game pass saves me time AND money by helping me rotate and experience different games faster.

And if game pass increases price so much to the point that it's no longer the efficient choice, my choice to buy games on steam is not taken away.

So I personally got real values from game sub services, nor I would lose money of they endlessly increase sub price. but I can't defend for it? Lol.