|
 |
By . on 2025-08-29 15:58:10
|
|
|
|
 |
By . on 2025-08-29 15:50:53
|
I am evil, so I am allowed to use AI however I want ;)
I use AI for good and titties.... and to make the tittie bounce... Classic: "Plot"
|
|
 |
By Carbuncle. Nynja on 2025-08-29 15:50:12
|
I am evil, so I am allowed to use AI however I want ;)
I use AI for good and titties.... and to make the tittie bounce... 
|
|
 |
By . on 2025-08-29 15:47:30
|
|
|
|
 |
By . on 2025-08-29 15:45:04
|
|
Afania you didn't teach me ***. I was always evil. Just hide it until it's time to strike ;).
|
|
 |
By Bismarck. Nickeny on 2025-08-29 15:43:52
|
I am evil, so I am allowed to use AI however I want ;)
I use AI for good and titties.... and to make the tittie bounce...
|
|
 |
By . on 2025-08-29 15:38:00
|
|
I agree. Light is a schoolkid with a God complex. He was never evil to begin with, nor was he "evil" later. Just corrupted by power.
|
|
 |
By . on 2025-08-29 15:35:28
|
I am evil, so I am allowed to use AI however I want ;)
|
|
 |
By . on 2025-08-29 15:33:12
|
|
|
|
 |
By Ragnarok. Zeig on 2025-08-29 15:23:29
|
Oh hey, it's La Noire! I played this game recently.
But the "doubt" option is changed to "bad cop" in the remastered version.
Bad cop! I never finished it. Twice :/
|
|
 |
By . on 2025-08-29 15:17:21
|
Losing long term relationships for short term gains is a potential consequence of psychopathic behavior, sure. But, to say it's part of the definition is silly. Behaving without empathy only costs you relationships if you don't consider the personal impact of losing those relationships. As a result, high-functioning psychopaths are not necessarily losing relationships as a consequence of their behavior. They're maintaining them for personal interest rather than empathy.
Also, your holier-than-thou attitude about relatively basic concepts is giving off a whole lot of narcissist vibes.
How do you measure empathy?
Do we do a blood test or do we observe behavioral patterns? If someone was a psychopath capable of maintaining relationships, then how do you know they're unempathetic? It only comes across as holier than thou because it made you feel bad enough to try to construct a reubuttle.
I never said I was capable of indulging in the dark triad. That's part of the point.
Everyone lies (machiavellianism) (speak no evil)
Everyone's selfish (narcissistic) (here no evil)
Everyone's blind (psychopathic) (see no evil)
Some people are integrous enough that they can acknowledge their own unconscious biases and work on it. Other people lack that same level of integrity of self-accountability. That's when the cross the line. You guys were making jedi memes. Neither the sith nor the jedi were correct. The way of the bendu, the way of the gray, is the true path. You cannot have too much light. Order stifles freedom. The light scorches the earth. You cannot have too much dark. For without light, life cannot grow.
|
|
 |
By Dodik on 2025-08-29 15:00:02
|
|
What Eiryl said.
TL;DR - you want to be at minimum 2k effective for savage blade.
|
|
 |
By . on 2025-08-29 14:56:08
|
He still doesn't get it. That's what I mean by arguing with Nynja is frivalous. To people like Nynja, words don't mean anything so they'll pick and choose when a word's meaning is applicable.
I'll give another example of psychopathy. If someone doesn't like being called something. If you continue to call them the thing they don't like, then your the ***. It's the simple. It's disresectful. It's like why did we have Malcom X and the black panthers movement? White people couldn't be respectful. White people refused to stop calling them a slur so eventually they became violent.
Have you ever read the Jean Paul Sartre quote?
“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
That's people like Nynja in a nutshell. It's the crux of why you can't argue with them and shouldn't bother to even have a discussion with them. You're wasting your breath. They'll indulge you. They'll entertain you with a conversation so long as you never really push back on anything they have to say or any of their ideology because they aren't the ones seeking to convince their opposition in earnest. They're the ones that use fear, intimidation, and force to push through the agenda regardless of what others may think or feel. That's why they're psychoic. When they're parsing for support they'll use flowery language and dog whistles. They'll outright lie to you. They'll misrepesent their opposition. They'll project their faults onto the opposition. Like Oh I'm not in the files it was those other guys!
I don't know if it speaks more to the failings of the education system or if it's symptomatic of our gradual descent into idiocracy. It's like when the kids use AI to do their homework. They think they understand what psychopathy is because they read it off google. Like what would bring is to water crops with Brondo?
I can type out a wall of text in minutes and the backroom joke is that you guys think it's AI.
|
|
 |
By . on 2025-08-29 14:52:30
|
|
|
|
 |
By Garuda. Chanti on 2025-08-29 14:49:39
|
Bismarck.Josiahflaming said: »What makes a sin a sin.
Who judges what constitutes a sin or not. each respective civilization holds this power, to judge and remove parts of their society they deem as "evil"
for example a tribe of apes in a jungle might exile one they deem as evil But the question was sin not evil.
Religions define what sins are. Civilizations define what is unlawful. Evil is subjective.
|
|
 |
|
|
If it was linear it'd be 4 / 8 / 12 at 1k / 2k / 3k unless im also misunderstanding
|
|
 |
By Rairin on 2025-08-29 14:39:42
|
|
The wiki pages show the 1000, 2000, and 3000 TP values. If the difference between 1000 and 2000 is the same as the difference between 2000 and 3000, then the WS is linear from 1k to 3k. It shouldn't need further explanation than that.
|
|
 |
|
|
You could always just look at the anchor points of the WS and determine that yourself.
|
|
 |
By Ragnarok. Zeig on 2025-08-29 14:38:08
|
that's the key thing that doesn't belong to lawful. That's fair, and I would say that I view him as predominantly lawful evil till he started going predominantyl chaotic later on
|
|
 |
By . on 2025-08-29 14:34:42
|
|
|
|
 |
By Ragnarok. Zeig on 2025-08-29 14:34:37
|
|
|
|
 |
By K123 on 2025-08-29 14:31:33
|
News to me, where is this proven and why don't wiki pages explain this on each ws?
|
|
 |
By Carbuncle. Nynja on 2025-08-29 14:29:00
|
|
My name is
Pantafer Nando
|
|
 |
By . on 2025-08-29 14:27:11
|
And if you disagree...
Please give me your name

|
|
 |
By . on 2025-08-29 14:18:08
|
|
I wouldnt
|
|
 |
|
|
Depending on the spell, you're not swapping out the relic feet
|
|
 |
By NynJa on 2025-08-29 13:52:20
|
|
Unless I'm mistaken and I've been wrong on my understanding of this the entire time, they are anchor points and the fTP values are linear formulas between 1000-1999 and 2000-3000, opposed to a parabola across 1000 and 3000.
|
|
 |
By Ragnarok. Zeig on 2025-08-29 13:45:27
|
Source: Afania's best friend
Looks like AI betrayed Afania :D
My AI doesn't. ;)
Before I respond to your post I had a heated debate with AI what alignment Light belongs to. After both sides presented examples of his actions AI agreed that Light isn't lawful evil.
The reasons that you read in my response post are reasons agreed by my AI too ;)
I mean, tons of people made Alignment grids for Death Note character and they often put Light in lawful evil camp. But Panta's example already showed that many people don't fully understand DnD framework at it's core due to the wording of the alignment.
So of course AI will favor lawful evil camp as quick answer because lawful evil has higher weight.
But if you explore the meaning of those alignments with AI further you may get a different answer.
I can probably slightly agree that Light is evil even though my inner "comrade radar" didn't ring when I read his story, but it did ring when I read Cersei or Scar's story.
But I legitimately don't see him as lawful so whoever consider him lawful online doesn't understand alignment system as well. :D AI is a yes-man. You guided it towards the result you wanted. I didnt /shrug
You conveniently ignored the arguments provided in my post for Light's aligntment. It seems you have a different understanding of what "lawful" means.
I did get the opinion of an auhtor friend who's been playing DnD for as long as I remember, and he didn't bat an eye describing Light as lawful evil. And we had a nice discussion about the alignment system (a topic I was never into, but I engaged in according to your definitions, to have common ground and make this fruitful)
But in any case, what matters is the "evil" alignment. If you finally begun to see that this is a reasonable position, then my job here is done. :)
|
|
 |
|
|
Is fTP on Savage Blade gradual, or do you have to reach 2000 and 3000 TP to yield the higher fTP effects?
I'm thinking specifically about the 500 TP Bonus on Moonshade Earring. All things considered with nothing else equipped, will I see an fTP bonus at 1000 natural TP, or do I need to wait until I hit 1500 natural TP to trigger the fTP equivalent of 2000 TP?
|
|
 |
By Carbuncle. Nynja on 2025-08-29 13:37:46
|
The fact you have to state "my" AI means that AI is nothing more than a glorified yes-man/woman that will input the response you want to see.
|