So question. If EU superstate is real. Does that mean Germans are no longer "German" and French no longer "French"? Do we just call them euros? Sounds like a huge loss of cultural identity
The loss of cultural identity -- or rather, the fear of it -- is one of the most power weapons a politician/leader/demagogue has in their arsenal because it suppose that someone wants to come along and take away said "cultural identity."
Which is patently ***. I think literally the
only group who could really fear that right now on the planet are radical quasi-religious/political regimes like ISIS, where their "culture" includes so many basic human rights violations that anyone wanting to preserve that "cultural identity" is borderline-objectively most-correctly labeled as a monster anyhow.
The idea of unions -- be it the U.S., EU, or any other union real, conceptual, or imagined -- is to bring together the best parts of the traditions of all its member entities.
Even if it's something stupid that we can have good-natured arguments over, like which regional method of enjoying a hot dog is best.
Sure, there are problems in life no matter how we approach it, but the concept of these unions -- and I'd
like to think I speak for most people here who are in favor of said unifications -- is that it offers the best of these traditions to all to be shared.
I know it's fashionable to hate on the U.S. a lot, and to criticize its problems, from without or within. I'm culpable myself sometimes of being overly-critical of my own country.
But even with its problems, it's got a lot of success going for it too through two-plus centuries of cultural blending, and I think you'll frequently see that both in the U.S. and around the globe that "Nationalism" -- which is basically just a positive way of saying "keep your shitty traditions out of our amazing culture" -- has very seldom
helped anyone in the long run.