I Created A FFXI NFT

Eorzea Time
 
 
 
Language: JP EN FR DE
users online
Forum » Everything Else » Chatterbox » I created a FFXI NFT
I created a FFXI NFT
 Ragnarok.Essoix
Offline
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: Ess
Posts: 5
By Ragnarok.Essoix 2021-11-12 07:27:35
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Because I'm bored. Check it out add a like or not.
I'm tempted to create some nice playing card versions. Or I could just log back in game.

https://opensea.io/collection/treasures-of-vanadiel

<3
Offline
Posts: 1533
By ScaevolaBahamut 2021-11-12 07:35:50
Link | Quote | Reply
 
we live in the dumbest timeline
[+]
 Ragnarok.Essoix
Offline
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: Ess
Posts: 5
By Ragnarok.Essoix 2021-11-12 07:42:51
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Yeap, a picture of an ape sold for 4Million USD today.
[+]
 Asura.Suteru
Offline
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: Suteru
Posts: 508
By Asura.Suteru 2021-11-12 07:44:29
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Ragnarok.Essoix said: »
Yeap, a picture of an ape sold for 4Million USD today.

"""sold"""
 Ragnarok.Essoix
Offline
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: Ess
Posts: 5
By Ragnarok.Essoix 2021-11-12 07:58:12
Link | Quote | Reply
 
my mistake, it sold for 1.5M and is now selling for 4M

here's transaction

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x3fd23f939a512e8de3444fe5d441e3a60c9c5c6d277ed65475d5e31c33913b4c
[+]
Offline
Posts: 12331
By Pantafernando 2021-11-12 08:00:51
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bring FFXI NFSW instead then we can start a conversation
Offline
Posts: 3943
By RadialArcana 2021-11-12 08:15:45
Link | Quote | Reply
 
It's just the next level of the art business.

People paying stupid amounts of money for a stupid modern art picture or a "unique" one of a kind picture that is actually easily duplicated in every detail. The owner of some massively overpriced work of art didn't buy it for the picture, he bought it for the status of owning the "one"

People are now buying digital pictures or videos as "unique" artworks, when anyone can make an exact copy of it (and that they just duplicated to sell). However you get a listing anyone can see as it being unique and yours in this system and to some this is enough, you don't even own the copyright you just own this duplicate that you paid for.

"I own the NFT (unique, but not) version of Nyan cat!" <- this is what people are actually paying for, not the image but the public knowledge that you own this particular duplicate of this image listed as being unique (when it's not) that has billions of identical copies in circulation.

It's about status, just to say "I own this important thing" and everyone knowing it because of the database that says so. So you can pay millions for a Nyan cat gif or a small video clip of an NBA hoop or whatever. People are paying a lot of money for these things, and it's from people who have more money than they could ever spend and so it has no value to them.

I can go out today and buy an exact painted copy of the mona lisa for couple hundred / thousand bucks, it would be near impossible to tell the difference. However it's not about the picture, it's about owning "the publicly accepted one" and this is the same stupid mindset from people that desire more status in our stupid world.
[+]
 Quetzalcoatl.Mithlas
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
user: Shinzaku
Posts: 271
By Quetzalcoatl.Mithlas 2021-11-12 08:19:48
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I see NFTs as more of owning a "Certificate of Authenticity" if comparing it to real-world art.
Still kinda weird though. I do see a possible application of NFTs for unique licenses that are tied to your wallet for access into apps/games. Can't really duplicate that check unless you steal someone's secret phrase/words lol
 Lakshmi.Avereith
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
user: Lilianna
Posts: 1194
By Lakshmi.Avereith 2021-11-12 08:28:03
Link | Quote | Reply
 
It's. Just. Money. Laundering.
[+]
 Shiva.Thorny
Offline
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Rairin
Posts: 2115
By Shiva.Thorny 2021-11-12 08:52:17
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Lakshmi.Avereith said: »
It's. Just. Money. Laundering.
Not all of it, a friend sold a NFT for $13000 less than a month ago, and I'm positive they aren't laundering money for anyone. Some of it is speculative investment.
[+]
 Asura.Eiryl
Offline
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: Eiryl
By Asura.Eiryl 2021-11-12 08:55:51
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I mean, speculating that someone will pay more in an effort to launder their money....

Really just splitting hairs
Offline
Posts: 878
By Rips 2021-11-12 09:22:30
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I said for someone to do this the other day in that random thread. Look at my manifestation powers.

In all honesty, neat, I guess.
Online
By Shichishito 2021-11-12 09:26:08
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Shiva.Thorny said: »
a friend
wait, you have friends?
Offline
Posts: 878
By Rips 2021-11-12 09:26:36
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Regarding the claim of money laundering - couldn’t we say that about physical art, too? The concept is the same. An NFT is just digital art, for the most part.
 Leviathan.Celebrindal
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3753
By Leviathan.Celebrindal 2021-11-12 09:32:15
Link | Quote | Reply
 
RadialArcana said: »
It's just the next level of the art business.

People paying stupid amounts of money for a stupid modern art picture or a "unique" one of a kind picture that is actually easily duplicated in every detail. The owner of some massively overpriced work of art didn't buy it for the picture, he bought it for the status of owning the "one"

People are now buying digital pictures or videos as "unique" artworks, when anyone can make an exact copy of it (and that they just duplicated to sell). However you get a listing anyone can see as it being unique and yours in this system and to some this is enough, you don't even own the copyright you just own this duplicate that you paid for.

"I own the NFT (unique, but not) version of Nyan cat!" <- this is what people are actually paying for, not the image but the public knowledge that you own this particular duplicate of this image listed as being unique (when it's not) that has billions of identical copies in circulation.

It's about status, just to say "I own this important thing" and everyone knowing it because of the database that says so. So you can pay millions for a Nyan cat gif or a small video clip of an NBA hoop or whatever. People are paying a lot of money for these things, and it's from people who have more money than they could ever spend and so it has no value to them.

I can go out today and buy an exact painted copy of the mona lisa for couple hundred / thousand bucks, it would be near impossible to tell the difference. However it's not about the picture, it's about owning "the publicly accepted one" and this is the same stupid mindset from people that desire more status in our stupid world.

This might be the single dumbest statement about art I've read in my entire lifetime. Your lack of knowledge about classic art markets and trying to say its just the same as the NFT market shows a complete misunderstanding of fine art and economics.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 3943
By RadialArcana 2021-11-12 09:58:46
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Leviathan.Celebrindal said: »
RadialArcana said: »
It's just the next level of the art business.

People paying stupid amounts of money for a stupid modern art picture or a "unique" one of a kind picture that is actually easily duplicated in every detail. The owner of some massively overpriced work of art didn't buy it for the picture, he bought it for the status of owning the "one"

People are now buying digital pictures or videos as "unique" artworks, when anyone can make an exact copy of it (and that they just duplicated to sell). However you get a listing anyone can see as it being unique and yours in this system and to some this is enough, you don't even own the copyright you just own this duplicate that you paid for.

"I own the NFT (unique, but not) version of Nyan cat!" <- this is what people are actually paying for, not the image but the public knowledge that you own this particular duplicate of this image listed as being unique (when it's not) that has billions of identical copies in circulation.

It's about status, just to say "I own this important thing" and everyone knowing it because of the database that says so. So you can pay millions for a Nyan cat gif or a small video clip of an NBA hoop or whatever. People are paying a lot of money for these things, and it's from people who have more money than they could ever spend and so it has no value to them.

I can go out today and buy an exact painted copy of the mona lisa for couple hundred / thousand bucks, it would be near impossible to tell the difference. However it's not about the picture, it's about owning "the publicly accepted one" and this is the same stupid mindset from people that desire more status in our stupid world.

This might be the single dumbest statement about art I've read in my entire lifetime. Your lack of knowledge about classic art markets and trying to say its just the same as the NFT market shows a complete misunderstanding of fine art and economics.

It's the same, people buying things for status. It's about showing you have so much money you can waste it on something so overpriced it would make putin blush.

The only value the original has over a copy is the status you get from being moneybags, if you need an expert to tell you the difference between the original and a copy it's all nonsense.

However, you're entitled to your opinion.