New Impeachment Scam Thread. Nice People Only.

um.. Schiff being one?

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/whistleblower-spoke-to-schiff-aides-before-filing-complaint

there's tons of news articles on it, call it facts I don't like if you want tho

That NYT article did nothing to prove Schiff had direct knowledge of the whistleblower's identity, it didn't even allege it.

You realize you posted an article that says in the link "Schiff's aides." As in, people not named Schiff.

Next it will be, schiff isn’t involved in what his aids did.

Everyone knows who the guy is at this point Eric Cariemella. Schiff has leaked it himself in his transcripts. Yet here he is today claiming he doesn’t know who he is.

Verified liar

The guy who launched an impeachment campaign off of one person's second or third-hand testimony didn't know the identity of this person, but his underlings did. Sounds totally legit.

Schiff also repeating the known falsehood that Russia hacked the 2016 election.

true but they work for the guy, thus he would know all the info or at the very least be one of the first members of congress with access to it.

No, WE don't. We the people, speculate and are investigating that now. Currently it's a partisan run attempt.

This "WE" you keep mentioning, does not exist. Look how many people here don't agree with that.

Schiff knowing the whistleblower makes him a witness in this proceedings. He SHOULD be called to testify. But he wont because he's running this show. That’s a MAJOR conflict of interest at the very least and completely corrupt.

We know how it played out, the whistleblower had a complaint and wanted to know how to file it, he reached out to Chairman Schiffs staff, they told him to go through the IG. That's the extent of the interaction.

This is all debunked.

Multiple credible witnesses have confirmed it, people here denying it means nothing. We know Congress approved the money in May. We know Trump blocked it until September 11th.

but why schiff's staff specifically? why not any other congress member's office? that is suspect

It was also proven they had no idea it was being blocked until later and was unrelated.

Because he chairs the relevant committee.

Oh give me a break. You know what OBAMA gave ukraine when it was being invaded by Russia?

Blankets.

Secondly the “favor” had nothing to do with investigating Biden, it specifically related Ukraines role the 2016 election scam and crowdstrike.

Third the legislation has deadlines for which the aid is to be given by and the aid was given by those deadlines. Theres no evidence anything improper happened, only innuendo and hearsay.

By libs own standards they would have hung Obama, we had an alliance with them and had pledged to defend them if russia ever attacked them. But what did Obama do when Russia took Crimea?

Then it's on to Russia Gate 3.0: This time for sure

This is all also completely fake.

No I didn't. You didnt come up with anything that Hunter Biden did wrong.

And there hasn't been any more proof that Trump did wrong than what has been for Hunter. It's all hearsay and supposition with contradictory evidence and statements for both. This is why we need full transparent (not this carefully curated ***we've been getting) investigations into BOTH

I'm pretty sure hearsay and speculation will hold up in a Senate trial though !

They should make Trump put on a glove if it doesn't fit you must acquit !

No, not even close. We know Trump blocked foreign aid for 4 months, that's an act of wrongdoing.

Oh it gets worse then that, Eric didn't even write the complaint it was written by his lawyer under direction from the chair of the house intelligence committee. The big giveaway was that Eric is a CIA agent not a lawyer, yet the complaint form and it's annexes were clearly written by someone with extensive legal expertise.

This isn't unheard of, I mean if your going to hire an attorney then it's usually best for them to fill out everyone and send it to you to review and sign. The difference is there is usually a special form you attach where you state it was prepared by this attorney and that you've designated them as your legal representative.

Which brings me to an interesting point, good lawyers are stupidly expensive out here (DC area). A CIA agent doesn't make enough money to retain one much less pay for all these services, so who exactly is paying this lawyer with deep connections to the Democrat National Committee?