By Lakshmi.Rylis 2009-10-15 00:12:34
Well, I feel they are pretty asinine in airbrushing an image, especially to such an extent. Hyperbolic presentations of beauty can already be beyond the levels of sense.. But to go so far as to take a thin, attractive model, and then distort her to sub-human levels is a bit ridiculous. Even further when you don't get any sense of actual beauty there, especially due to proportions..
As for their ability to distort the image.. Odds are, her contract contains a release that allows them the rights to the image, and this often means the company can use or distort the image largely as they please. This is especially true since the model likely agreed to airbrushing in previous circumstances to allow for a better picture.
As for being fired for being too fat.. Unfortunately, again.. Many of these contracts are pretty precise. If they can provide evidence to the idea that her job function was to model these clothes, and that it requires a specific figure to model their intended line, they can terminate contract for breach.
It really is unattractive, though, and the woman herself is not. It seems like a distorted sense of beauty that drive these designers, because the clothing they sell often extends into sizes that are larger than the models they'd attempt to discharge for their weight.