Im not espousing or arguing against any belief system or lack thereof. Simply stating a basic fact that modern humans or the earth itself being 10k years old is disproven by all relevant evidence. I don't know why this is controversial.
You basically stated that the difference between belief systems was irrelevant. Make sure you know what you're arguing before backpedaling a few posts later.
That being said, define "disproven". There is "disproven" in the true scientific sense, which is in layman's terms to say that we don't know everything, but with all the evidence we have this is our best conclusion. Then there's "disproven" in the non-scientific (read: stupid) sense, which is to say "Even though I'm basically a glorified ape with a limited perspective on the universe, I'm 100% right, everyone else is wrong, end of story."
