My idea in the start was possibly the Space between 2 Magnets was being altered. Even though I know Magnets do not attract all objects. Possibly why everywhere I read claimed Magnetics =/= Gravity yet it is still involved in the equation.
Your second link just goes to page 5 of the thread so I'm not sure which post you're referencing.
So the particles being charged hitting the Magnetosphere interaction creates altered state of the Northern Lights? That would make sense. While this...
Bending light stronger than ever before by accelerating electrons
...still does the same exact trick
These two things are nothing alike. One is charged ions hitting atoms in the upper atmosphere and creating new light by giving energy to those atoms and then those atoms give off the various colored light depending on the atom which was hit by the ion.
Refraction is literally just light traveling through different objects at different speeds. Light travels slower when it is going through a material than it does when it travels in space or a vacuum. Refraction is the bending of light but it is different than gravity.
I understood and realized and respected that point was the case. Do we have anything beyond Einstein's Cross to verify that Gravity bends Light? I see it as the explanation of Black Holes while that itself still is suspect like Einstein's Cross.
Einstein's Cross is just the simplest and most easily observable interaction between gravity and light. Anything else is going to be less obvious but we can literally measure the effect of gravity on light in a lab with sensitive enough equipment.
A Theory created and used to explain another "new" Theory. Electromagnetics has been proven to not be a Theory all while Rejected against Einstein unproven Theory. Einstein's Theory is mutating into total Insanity.
Rejection of Reality = Insane
We have a theory of electromagnetics. It is a theory. Again note that Theory does not mean "guess" or some random idea that may be true but a body of events we can show to be true with evidence. I'm really not sure what you're saying here. Einstein has a huge amount of work in his life. Which theory of his are you talking about? And let's just be clear here, a theory does not need to be proven. What people mean when they say that is that we have observable facts that further support an already developed theory.
What I want to know is...
-Testing Gravity in a space Vaacum-
Does testing on Earth alter the verdict compared to being in Deep Space?
This will tell me if our Solar System is "falling" or Not. The Answer cannot remain a Contradiction (physics pun)
Yeah, it does affect it because as you get farther away from earth, or any object with mass, the effect of gravity gets smaller. So if you set up the vacuum test on earth, it would accelerate faster because it is closer and the gravity is stronger. If you did it in deep space far away from any massive object the gravity is weaker. The objects would still feel the forces of gravity no matter how far they are but they would be less affected by it.
You need to get past your hang up on the solar system "falling". The sun's massive gravity is keeping everything in the solar system together and together we are all traveling around the center of our galaxy. We are orbiting the sun, which is orbiting the center of the galaxy. We are all also affected by the gravity of all the other objects in the universe, but their affects are so small due to distance that only the largest ones are really having a big enough impact to see. But "falling" is a bad understanding of what is happening and it seems to be confusing you as you understand falling as going directly toward an object. Just ignore the "falling" part. It was meant to be a way to understand what was happening and it is just causing confusion.
The "Pun" is on me. I see. "Masses Cancel" Gravity is Alien to Space. Gravitational Pull is a Myth.
The vid in that link is an illusion. The Vacuum removed Earth's atmosphere (Gravity) yet failed to remove Earth itself from the experiment. Therefore it is Too Weak to hold our Solar System in Orbit together let alone be the Reason everything Revolves around the Sun.
I'm not sure where this "mass cancels" thing you are talking about came from. Perhaps someone else's post? If you can point me to where something says that I'll try to explain it.
The earth's atmosphere is not gravity. In that video experiment, the air of the atmosphere is what causes objects to fall slower. Less massive objects with large surface areas like paper and feathers fall slower in air due to wind resistance. They have to move the air out of the way to fall. When you remove the air, they do not have to fight to move it out of the way anymore and can fall faster. Removing the air does not remove the gravity of the earth... It is NOT an illusion. The experiment was not supposed to remove earth. If you made earth, the sun and everything in the universe vanish, then the feather would not experience any gravity at all and thus would not move. If you just removed earth then the sun would then be the most gravity the feather would experience and then it would start moving toward the sun, although it would accelerate MUCH slower because the sun is so far away the gravity is weaker than the earth's (at the same point. The gravity of the sun in total is much larger than the earth but the earth is closer in the experiment so the feather is feeling the effect of the earth's gravity much more strongly than the sun's.)
So no, it is not too weak to hold the solar system in orbit and holding things in orbit IS what it means for things to revolve around the sun.
I really fail to see what this below mess is about but I'll answer the questions so you can stop showing them:
- Either Electromagnetics exists in Gravity or it doesnt.
NO. Electromagnetics is a separate thing from gravity. They both exist but they are not a part of each other
- Either Electromagnetics bends Light or it doesnt.
NO. Electromagnetics cannot bend light.
- Either Gravity effects Light or it doesnt.
YES. Gravity affects light and thus it can bend it.
- Either the Rotation/Spin of the Sun/Planets effect the flow of Space or they do not.
NO, NO and HELL NO. Rotation and spin have absolutely nothing to due with the orbits of the planets and there is no "Flow" of space like flow of water in a sink.
- Either Gravity is holding together our Solar System or it is not.
YES. Gravity affects all objects with mass so they feel attraction this mutual attraction is what keeps us together
- Either Stars produce Atoms or they are not attracted to Planets.
Stars "combine" atoms together to form larger atoms. Smaller atoms formed without stars and no that is NOT the reason why they are attracted to planets and I honestly don't know where you get this idea that this is an either or question
- Either Magetic Spheres can lock Stars, Planets, Moons together or not.
NO. Magnets are too weak to lock stars planets or moons together or even in orbit Gravity does this
