Garuda.Chanti said: »
big green weenie.
Random Politics & Religion #11
|
Random Politics & Religion #11
Sounds gross and kinky at the same time.
[+]
[+]
So your rebuttal against being dismissive is to be dismissive.
Cerberus.Pleebo said: » So your rebuttal against being dismissive is to be dismissive. That's dismissive squared.
[+]
Cerberus.Pleebo said: » So your rebuttal against being dismissive is to be dismissive. I don't think pointing out your flaw is being dismissive. You did a good job in warping my rebuttal to match your agenda against me though. Should probably take a shower, your democrat is showing.
[+]
fonewear said: » Rule 20 of the internet: Nothing is to be taken seriously But you can take it cerealsly
[+]
Look at this face and try to take it seriously. I dare ya !
  I'm surprised they didn't ask more serious question at the debate like:
"What are going to do to nerf BLU?"
[+]
eliroo said: » I'm surprised they didn't ask more serious question at the debate like: "What are going to do to nerf BLU?" That and when are we going to merge the servers !
[+]
BLU Nerfs
Trump: I have the best nerfs for BLU in mind. You will be blown away by the nerfs I have for them. Hiliary: I think we should consider the lives that BLUs live and how bad they must feel being discriminated against. Server Merge: Trump: We will build a wall around the server so those silly people from other Servers won't invade Asura Hilliary: My IT guy is good with servers.
[+]
eliroo said: » I don't think pointing out your flaw is being dismissive. You did a good job in warping my rebuttal to match your agenda against me though. Should probably take a shower, your democrat is showing. That's Lordgrims platform.
These guys are more of an Overwatch type. "What are you going to do to counter OP teams rolling with 3 tanks?" eliroo said: » Phoenix.Xantavia said: » Asura.Kingnobody said: » Josiahkf said: » The GOP is ***because it panders to the discriminatory, KN I'm not going to deny that the GOP panders to the narrow viewpoints of certain people, mainly religious people. But you cannot deny that the liberals/democrats does the exact same thing. Not familiar with this, what are we talking about here? Some real ideas about removing rights from citizens, like gay marriage, or having religious feels take priority over treating customers equally in a business. page 32 Quote: we do not accept the Supreme Court’s redefinition of marriage and we urge its reversal, whether through judicial reconsideration or a constitutional amendment returning control over marriage to the states. We oppose government discrimination against businesses or entities which decline to sell items or services to individuals for activities that go against their religious views about such activities. My link seems to have failed. Try this
-ben_1468872234.pdf]Your text to link here... I saw Lordgrim in the audience last night:
 I give up. Google GOP 2016 platform.
You don't need to watch the news.
Restricting abortion rights means restricting the rights of women. Forbidding civil equality to homosexuals means restricting their rights. Maybe one day a couple of posters here will understand these simple concepts. And don't get me started on the idiocy of being intolerant towards intolerance is so intolerant! Phoenix.Xantavia said: » Quote: we do not accept the Supreme Court’s redefinition of marriage and we urge its reversal, whether through judicial reconsideration or a constitutional amendment returning control over marriage to the states. We oppose government discrimination against businesses or entities which decline to sell items or services to individuals for activities that go against their religious views about such activities. Fair enough, really can't argue with that. Valefor.Sehachan said: » Restricting abortion rights means restricting the rights of women. Forbidding civil equality to homosexuals means restricting their rights. Honestly with that logic telling people to buckle their seat belts restrict their rights. Enforcing more gun control restricts peoples rights. I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you but the logic isn't sound. The intent of those restrictions aren't to limit rights but rather protect the sanctity of life or marriage in their views. You have to understand their view points and intentions before you can really assume what they are doing.
[+]
No one impacts your sacred views of life and beyond. But you are forcing yours onto them by forbidding them from having same rights(homosexuals), or even worse rule their own body(women).
[+]
eliroo said: » The intent of those restrictions aren't to limit rights but rather protect the sanctity of life or marriage in their views.
[+]
I thought you were talking about FFXI and was thinking what are you talking about !
|
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.