I'd suggest maybe reading the article?
I'd suggest maybe actually reading what the "article" Nausi posted is complaining about? What it claims isn't what actually occurred.
You could see the actual usage of the graph
here, at about 1 minute in.
Stopped reading here.
Quote:
and implies that coal and gas companies have paid the climate denier to give speeches.
Oh, good.
So you got to this part here:
Quote:
The scientist highlights the flaws in two line graphs in particular that Bastardi included in his opinion piece, and implies that coal and gas companies have paid the climate denier to give speeches.
Which has utterly nothing to do with what Nausi's "article" is claiming.
You can actually view the video at the link above, and see the discussion regarding the graph at approximately one minute in.
So, again:
?