|
AGW Theory - Discussion
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20130
By Shiva.Nikolce 2015-11-02 14:46:45
Years of false predictions, decades really, and yet the alarmists still tout the "science" card like they've predicted everything correct all along.
Makes me laugh.
could you share a link to one?
I can't find a reliable source on the internet... none of them have links to the actual story or article mentioned and they all sound like
"In 1975 renowned Dr. Seymore Buttz said "we're all going to die in thirty years" and we haven't... so in your face climatologists!
here is a lame one
Ragnarok.Nausi
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2015-11-02 16:31:15
Years of false predictions, decades really, and yet the alarmists still tout the "science" card like they've predicted everything correct all along.
Makes me laugh.
Some predictions are made, sometimes they are close, other times they are off. If you know there's a 50/50 chance of flipping a coin and getting heads, that doesn't mean that getting 3 or 4 in a row invalidates that 50/50 chance.
Can you point to one study over the past 30 years that's gotten today's temp right?
Can you point to 10?
Ragnarok.Nausi
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2015-11-02 16:31:53
Whoops double posted
By Jassik 2015-11-02 18:32:26
Years of false predictions, decades really, and yet the alarmists still tout the "science" card like they've predicted everything correct all along.
Makes me laugh.
Some predictions are made, sometimes they are close, other times they are off. If you know there's a 50/50 chance of flipping a coin and getting heads, that doesn't mean that getting 3 or 4 in a row invalidates that 50/50 chance.
Can you point to one study over the past 30 years that's gotten today's temp right?
Can you point to 10?
That graph is near meaningless, but you're misunderstanding a very substantial piece of the pie. Those IPCC models are not meant specifically to be predictive and in addition, those predictions were done by who?
You keep hammering on about these models and how they were wrong, except the none of the stuff you post to dispute them ever says who's model they are or who did the predictions. It's just "some dude looked at a blueprint and built this messed up house, I don't know who made the blueprint or who built the house, but construction is a lie!"
Server: Hades
Game: FFXI
Posts: 138
By Hades.Altimaomega 2015-11-02 21:01:26
Does coming up with horrible analogy's come naturally for you?
Ragnarok.Nausi
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2015-11-02 21:12:55
Whoops looks like Antarctica isn't really loosing ice at all and gaining it instead.
Just chalk it up on that long list of doomsday predictions that aren't coming true.
Remember when alarmists screamed that loss of ice was proof positive that panic was justified? Good times.....
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2015-11-02 21:15:56
Looks like you didn't read the article nausi, not surprising.
[+]
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2623
By Sylph.Jeanpaul 2015-11-02 21:46:39
Here's a more detailed article directly from NASA themselves:
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses
The key points to catch are:
Quote: The extra snowfall that began 10,000 years ago has been slowly accumulating on the ice sheet and compacting into solid ice over millennia, thickening the ice in East Antarctica and the interior of West Antarctica by an average of 0.7 inches (1.7 centimeters) per year. Quote: But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.” Quote: “The good news is that Antarctica is not currently contributing to sea level rise, but is taking 0.23 millimeters per year away,” Zwally said. “But this is also bad news. If the 0.27 millimeters per year of sea level rise attributed to Antarctica in the IPCC report is not really coming from Antarctica, there must be some other contribution to sea level rise that is not accounted for.”
Cerberus.Pleebo
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9720
By Cerberus.Pleebo 2015-11-02 21:54:26
Years of false predictions, decades really, and yet the alarmists still tout the "science" card like they've predicted everything correct all along.
Makes me laugh.
Some predictions are made, sometimes they are close, other times they are off. If you know there's a 50/50 chance of flipping a coin and getting heads, that doesn't mean that getting 3 or 4 in a row invalidates that 50/50 chance.
Can you point to one study over the past 30 years that's gotten today's temp right?
Can you point to 10?
This graph is incomplete. How is the y-axis defined? I assume it's a temperature anomaly but what is the baseline? The choice of baseline is important because it's possible to choose a baseline that exaggerates an anomaly (cherry-picking, basically). Not defining axes is a big indication that the presentation is dishonest.
Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13638
By Bahamut.Ravael 2015-11-02 22:04:38
To get away from the slapfight for a moment, I'm interested in hearing speculation on where this extra water is coming from.
[+]
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2623
By Sylph.Jeanpaul 2015-11-02 22:12:13
To get away from the slapfight for a moment, I'm interested in hearing speculation on where this extra water is coming from. The dude from NASA didn't say anything, so they're likely not in a position to say anything concrete. If I had to venture a wild guess, I'd say melting land ice and permafrost from arctic locations like Alaska, Russia, Greenland, and Canada.
Ragnarok.Nausi
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2015-11-02 22:33:36
To get away from the slapfight for a moment, I'm interested in hearing speculation on where this extra water is coming from. The dude from NASA didn't say anything, so they're likely not in a position to say anything concrete. If I had to venture a wild guess, I'd say melting land ice and permafrost from arctic locations like Alaska, Russia, Greenland, and Canada. Hmm, not gonna say anything concrete huh? Sounds like they're..... skeptical.
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2015-11-02 22:38:01
Yeah, the guys in your article aren't going to say anything concrete, further weakening your own argument.
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2623
By Sylph.Jeanpaul 2015-11-02 22:38:33
To get away from the slapfight for a moment, I'm interested in hearing speculation on where this extra water is coming from. The dude from NASA didn't say anything, so they're likely not in a position to say anything concrete. If I had to venture a wild guess, I'd say melting land ice and permafrost from arctic locations like Alaska, Russia, Greenland, and Canada. Hmm, not gonna say anything concrete huh? Sounds like they're..... skeptical. It's pretty obvious that if they made a claim without having anything to show, then it'd just be used against them.
Cerberus.Pleebo
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9720
By Cerberus.Pleebo 2015-11-02 22:51:48
It's also outside the scope of the study so they shouldn't be expected to offer anything concrete. It's a topic for future research.
Bahamut.Milamber
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3691
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-11-03 01:09:43
Years of false predictions, decades really, and yet the alarmists still tout the "science" card like they've predicted everything correct all along.
Makes me laugh.
Some predictions are made, sometimes they are close, other times they are off. If you know there's a 50/50 chance of flipping a coin and getting heads, that doesn't mean that getting 3 or 4 in a row invalidates that 50/50 chance.
Can you point to one study over the past 30 years that's gotten today's temp right?
Can you point to 10?
Why is plotting the average of 102 models valid as an comparison?
Server: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2011
By Phoenix.Dabackpack 2015-11-03 01:22:53
Ragnarok.Nausi
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2015-11-03 09:44:42
It's also outside the scope of the study so they shouldn't be expected to offer anything concrete. It's a topic for future research.
"Antarctica is loosing ice" has been a staple of the AGW crowd for at least 10 years. Now we find out that whoops it's actually been gaining ice.
The alarmists were flat out wrong. Again.
[+]
Garuda.Chanti
Server: Garuda
Game: FFXI
Posts: 11372
By Garuda.Chanti 2015-11-03 10:30:56
Whoops looks like Antarctica isn't really loosing ice at all and gaining it instead.
Just chalk it up on that long list of doomsday predictions that aren't coming true.
Remember when alarmists screamed that loss of ice was proof positive that panic was justified? Good times..... You are a bit late with that.
I posted it on P 27.
Phoenix.Dabackpack said: »HIGHLY recommended.
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2015-11-03 10:50:33
It's also outside the scope of the study so they shouldn't be expected to offer anything concrete. It's a topic for future research.
"Antarctica is loosing ice" has been a staple of the AGW crowd for at least 10 years. Now we find out that whoops it's actually been gaining ice.
The alarmists were flat out wrong. Again.
Looks like you still haven't read your own article.
[+]
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20130
By Shiva.Nikolce 2015-11-03 11:30:13
Why is plotting the average of 102 models valid as an comparison?
More importantly the actual rise in every other chart is .8 which is a lot closer to the 1 predicted than the .2 claimed on this chart
Valefor.Sehachan
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2015-11-03 13:11:43
Harvard scientists suggest spraying diamond dust into the atmosphere
*starts summoning Shiva*
it costs too much so they're thinking about aluminium instead
Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13638
By Bahamut.Ravael 2015-11-03 14:06:17
I really hope such things get considered only as a last resort. Humans tend to be really good at trying to solve problems... only to create new, unintended problems.
[+]
Garuda.Chanti
Server: Garuda
Game: FFXI
Posts: 11372
By Garuda.Chanti 2015-11-09 17:39:03
CO2 Levels Hit Record High for 30th Year in a Row
Scientific American (Which we all know is liberal because reality has a strong liberal bias.
Quote: Relentless emissions of heat-trapping gases are endangering the planet, the World Meteorological Organization says Quote: GENEVA, Nov 9 (Reuters) - Greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere reached a record high in 2014 and the relentless fuelling of climate change is endangering the planet for future generations, the World Meteorological Organization said on Monday.
"Every year we say that time is running out. We have to act NOW to slash greenhouse gas emissions if we are to have a chance to keep the increase in temperatures to manageable levels," WMO Secretary-General Michel Jarraud said in a statement.
His annual plea for the world to do whatever it can to cut greenhouse gas emissions - which come mainly from burning fossil fuels and from agriculture, cement production and deforestation - comes weeks before negotiators from over 190 states convene in Paris to try to agree a new U.N. climate deal.
Graphs issued by the WMO, a U.N. agency, showed levels of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, climbing steadily towards the 400-parts-per-million (ppm) level, having hit a new record every year since reliable records began in 1984.
Carbon dioxide levels averaged 397.7 ppm in 2014 but briefly breached the 400-ppm threshold in the northern hemisphere in early 2014, and again globally in early 2015.
"Next year we will be reporting much higher concentrations because of El Nino," WMO atmospheric research chief Oksana Tarasova told Reuters, referring to the Pacific Ocean warming phenomenon.
Soon 400 ppm will be a permanent reality, Jarraud said.
"It means hotter global temperatures, more extreme weather events like heat waves and floods, melting ice, rising sea levels and increased acidity of the oceans. This is happening now and we are moving into uncharted territory at a frightening speed."
The rise in carbon dioxide levels is being amplified by higher levels of water vapour, which are in turn rising because of carbon dioxide emissions, the WMO said.
Levels of the other two major man-made greenhouse gases, methane and nitrous oxide, also continued a unrelenting annual rise in 2014, reaching 1,833 parts per billion (ppb) and 327.1 ppb, respectively. Both rose at the fastest rate for a decade.
For the Paris conference later this month, more than 150 countries, led by top greenhouse gas emitters China and the United States, have issued plans to limit emissions beyond 2020.
But the plans revealed so far will not curb emissions enough to meet a target agreed in 2010 to limit global warming to within 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) of pre-industrial levels.
"Two degrees will be bad enough but it will be better than three degrees," said Jarraud. "Of course it would have been better to have 1 degree... But 1 degree is not possible any longer. It's just not feasible. Too late." (Reporting by Tom Miles; Editing by Mark Heinrich)
Asura.Saevel
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9910
By Asura.Saevel 2015-11-09 18:57:21
*Chuckles*
That's hilarious. Keep pumping the hype machine, demanding action right now to sell your limited time offer, while supplies last.
Anyhow reality has already disproved Global Warming. Progressives are falling back to their old methods of repeating a lie often enough so that it seems like the truth.
" The future is known, it's the past that keeps changing".
[+]
Server: Hades
Game: FFXI
Posts: 138
By Hades.Altimaomega 2015-11-09 19:02:34
Highest levels ever yet the arctic continues to expand. /sigh
Server: Hades
Game: FFXI
Posts: 138
By Hades.Altimaomega 2015-11-09 19:11:10
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33594654
and
Some good news on the global warming front for a change.
Increase in Antarctic snow is greater than losses: NASA
Zeenews, India (no idea why this source was the one that google news picked)
Quote: Washington DC: A new NASA study has revealed that the mass gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.
The new study showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.
Lead author Jay Zwally of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center believes that it might only take a few decades for Antarctica's growth to reverse.
For the research, Zwally and his team used meteorological data beginning in 1979 to show that the snowfall in East Antarctica actually decreased by 11 billion tons per year during both the European Remote Sensing (ERS) and NASA 's Earth Observing System periods (ICESat).
They also used information on snow accumulation for tens of thousands of years, derived by other scientists from ice cores, to conclude that East Antarctica has been thickening for a very long time.
Zwally's team found that the mass gain from the thickening of East Antarctica remained steady from 1992 to 2008 at 200 billion tons per year, while the ice losses from the coastal regions of West Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula increased by 65 billion tons per year.
Zwally said that the good news was that Antarctica was not currently contributing to sea level rise, but was taking 0.23 millimeters per year away.
However, he said that if the 0.27 millimeters per year of sea level rise attributed to Antarctica in the report is not really coming from Antarctica, there must be some other contribution to sea level rise that was not accounted for.
The study is published in the Journal of Glaciology.
If the world is heating up like never before, please explain this.
By Jassik 2015-11-09 19:12:06
30 pages into the second AGW thread and Altima still can't understand what a global average temperature is.
This thread per request and to alleviate debates in the Random P&R thread is for general discussion / debates / graphs / etc. on AGW (man made global warming) Theory.
Want to provide evidence of its existence, question that evidence, etc.?
Do it here.
Let's see how this goes.
Keep it relatively civil so I don't have to de-main it!
|
|