Trump Talk™

What's sad is that the two people who gave you [+] doesn't understand that you were being sarcastic.


People keep saying "loophole" without actually pointing one out. When I ask people to show me a tax "loophole" (by definition a loophole is something that the law did not intend to create) nobody can answer that but continue to state that it exists.

So, why not tell us what sort of tax loophole exists, please.

So, are you saying that it is a bad thing to take advantage of the tax deductions available to you? Guess what, I'm 100% positive that you take most deductions (if not all) available to you when paying your tax. So, hypocrite says what again?

Holy ***he is learning!

I didn't say anything about it being wrong for them to use the deductions they are allowed, I said it was *** that the system allows them to.

I didn't say anything about it being wrong for them to use the deductions they are allowed, I said it was *** that the system allows them to.

Never said loophole and I never accused them of breaking the law, bubba.

So, you aren't saying that it's wrong to use the laws to your own advantage, instead you are saying it's wrong to use the laws to your own advantage.....wait, what?

Let's read that again, shall we?

Yup, that's what you said alright....

Good, because I wasn't addressing you when I was replying to a specific person. I guess you really need some reading comprehension. Or at least understand that the person I'm quoting directly above a response is who I am referring to in my response....

I was advocating getting private money out of politics. Why do you feel the need to turn any discussion involving money into sideshow of tax law? Is it specifically so you can try and bully people around with your amazing knowledge about something besides pokemon?

Sure, flail away. Because you were talking about how the poor illegal immigrants were paying federal income taxes when I had to correct you. Or are you saying that wasn't what was being talked about?

What is your aggression against me? Hate being proven wrong when I source my arguments? We are all still waiting for you to provide us with that unbiased, professional source of yours since, what, last page?

Love the insults by the way. I'm sure if reported, it will be ignored like usual.

Yup, flailing it is.

Failing about talking about Trump too.

What are Trump's viewpoints on taxation?

4 brackets: 1-5-10-15%.
1 time 14.25% tax on wealthy.
Asset tax over $10 million, paid over 10 years.

For one thing, those brackets are way too low, a lot of things are not going to be funded that way, hell, you cannot even fund the defense budget that way.

Idk about the asset tax.

You think taxes are too low? Of course you would, you conservative partisan hack.

Wait, no... something isn't right here....

I for one do not want to see the American Revolution Part 2 in my lifetime

All I can say is that Trump will not win. He dug his grave for himself and his toupee.....with a silver spade! :p

4 brackets: 1-5-10-15%.
1 time 14.25% tax on wealthy.
Asset tax over $10 million, paid over 10 years.

For one thing, those brackets are way too low, a lot of things are not going to be funded that way, hell, you cannot even fund the defense budget that way.

The one-time tax is ludicrous, we all know the federal government is greedy as ***.

Asset tax is the same as value added tax, which itself is another "tax on the rich" scheme liberals like to use. Trump himself suggesting it baffles my mind.

These are the key points he makes, but either way, it's not feasible at all...

1) Tariffs would bring boat loads of money from American companies who have slave labor as their bottom line in other counties, in time driving manufacturing jobs back into where they belong. Thus allowing millions of Americans to actually have a life and contribute to society & it's debts.

2) Build an physical border that would be for the most part a one time investment, rather than every year employing thousands of worthless border patrol agents who hand out water & bologna sandwiches to illegals. Ending this anchor baby nonsense would remove a lot of incentive for the illiterate people who have no respect for this nation & for which it stand. Saving untold 10's if not hundreds of millions in tax payers money for education. That alone could pay for a border wall in a decade.

3) Trade deals, that is a given those deals were written not with Americans (other than a handful) best intentions.

4) Or we can continue as we are, start a World War & killing off millions living here effectively hitting the rest button.

medals

I think America can do without medals



although it would definitely need metals.

So, you want to start paying more for American made products? By all means, go ahead and start doing it.

You have no clue as how much immigration has helped this country. Hell, by "physically" keeping the immigrants out, you still have not even come close to solving the real problem, which is the rampant crime that immigration (legal or not) brings with it.

I don't understand, you want to get rid of trade deals? If so, how is any of these trade deals, as you put it, not in America's best interest? ....

Going by your post, you wish for a xenophobic America, cut off from the rest of the world. I hate to break it to you bub, but in today's global economy, by doing that would make America into a 3rd world country. We do not have the means to survive at our level of consumption. A lot of our products are imported not because of "cheap labor" (it's a good reason, but not the main reason) but because we don't have the resources on hand to produce that product, nor the materials (newsflash, most materials "made in America" are imported, but assembled in America to have that stamp on it...) to survive.

We have abundant food and metals, and enough energy to survive, but nothing else. We may be able to create our own building materials for a while, but at the level of growth we have been sustaining for the past few decades, we would run out of those very quickly.

And that's basically it. Everything else we use is generally imported.

What you are demanding is economic suicide.

2) Build an physical border that would be for the most part a one time investment, rather than every year employing thousands of worthless border patrol agents who hand out water & bologna sandwiches to illegals. Ending this anchor baby nonsense would remove a lot of incentive for the illiterate people who have no respect for this nation & for which it stand. Saving untold 10's if not hundreds of millions in tax payers money for education. That alone could pay for a border wall in a decade.

Besides the fact that it wouldn't work, they go over, around, and under the wall sections that already exist. It wouldn't be a one time investment, it would take tons of maintenance. It also wouldn't reduce the need for border patrols. "Show me a 10 foot fence and I'll show you an 11 foot ladder"...

The rest of your statement is incredibly offensive and misplaced. MOST of the people coming across the border are neither illiterate or from Mexico.

Why is that King? Why are most things imported? Could it have anything with free trade agreements offshoring our jobs and helping hollow out the middle class? Possibly even with St. Ronald the President singly handedly changing us from the largest creditor in the world to the largest debtor in the world?

We export more services than we import, so guess what, we just got a huge unemployment issue that cannot be immediately resolved.

So people in India call customer support and get us or what? What services are we exporting more of than we import?

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump wants more than a wall to keep out immigrants living in the country illegally. He also wants to end "birthright citizenship" for their children, he said Sunday. And he would rescind Obama administration executive orders on immigration and toughen deportation, allowing in only "the good ones."

Trump described his expanded vision of how to secure American borders during a wide-ranging interview Sunday on NBC's "Meet The Press," saying that he would push to end the constitutionally protected citizenship rights of children of any family living illegally inside the U.S.

"They have to go," Trump said, adding: "What they're doing, they're having a baby. And then all of a sudden, nobody knows...the baby's here."

Native-born children of immigrants — even those living illegally in the U.S. — have been automatically considered American citizens since the adoption of the 14th amendment of the U.S. Constitution in 1868.

The odds of repealing the amendment's citizenship clause would be steep, requiring the votes of two-thirds of both houses of Congress and support from three-fourths of the nation's state legislatures. Republicans in Congress have pushed without success to repeal that provision since 2011.

"They're illegal," Trump said, describing native-born children of people living illegally in the US. "You either have a country or not."

Trump's remarks came as his campaign website posted his program for "immigration reform." Among its details: Making Mexico pay for a permanent border wall. Mandatory deportation of all "criminal aliens." Tripling the force of immigration officers by eliminating tax credit payments to immigrant families residing illegally in the U.S.

He said that families with U.S.-born children could return quickly if deemed worthy by the government. "We're going to try and bring them back rapidly, the good ones," he said, adding: "We will expedite it so people can come back in. The good people can come back."