Trump Talk™

lol if they do they got it from somewhere else, they sure as hell didn't make it.

Their enrichment levels were nowhere near the quality for weapons grade.

But hey, you, like Jassik, will believe anything Obama says. Even though he has lied to your (and the nation's) face most of his presidential career....you will still believe him blindly......without any thought of your own......

I guess you forget (or choose to ignore) that Iran is one of the largest donors of ISIS and Al Qaeda in the world. You also forget that Hamas has stated multiple times that they will destroy both Israel and the West when given a chance.

They're a mixed bag of jealousy and hatred for the West backed by the religious fanaticism of a violent, believing military (and likely terrorists to boot).

But it's a country with almost 80 million people, with a large majority of them innocent civilians trying to live day-to-day just like you or I.

I guess you forget (or choose to ignore) that Iran is one of the largest donors of ISIS and Al Qaeda in the world....

Ok so with all the discussions going on I decided to do a lookup of Bernie Sanders and his political presence and holy *** have you guys bought the fabricated narrative hook line and sinker.

He is a card carrying foot solder for the Democratic party, it doesn't get more bought and paid for them him. He is so far progressive that you might as well call him comrade. His entire political career has been as a progressive Democrat and is about as "independent" as George Bush Jr. He's one of the "drag the rich through the streets and take all their stuff" type progressives. Pure socialism and wealth redistribution. His official affiliation as "independent" as just a title so that the Democrats can claim they have one on their side. The idea that he's an independent who's not one of "the team" is a complete fabrication, he takes his marching orders from the same people the other other Democrats do.

I can also see why the Democrats told him to volunteer his name. They want an extremist to use as a political sparing partner against Hillary so as to make her look more moderate for the general election and it doesn't get much more extreme then Bernie. Obviously he's not supposed to win and they will carefully orchestrate the primary such that it looks like he "gave it a good try" but he'll throw the match. They even have gone so far as to ensure another Obama primary won't happen, where the unintended candidate ends up getting the most and thus the nomination. They will carefully manage the primary so that it looks like a sorta kinda fair fight but the winner is preordained as Hillary Clinton. The Republicans wanted to do the same thing but Trump, and his threat of ruining their election chances if they rig the primary, destroyed any hope they had for a managed primary with a preordained winner.

There is nothing objective or quantifiable in your statement. It's just a bunch of tinfoil and hyperbole. Generally, when someone is trying to be persuasive, they use verifiable facts.

Don't forget words that are merely qualifiers being presented as insults!

It's cute when people constantly say "socialist" like it's a bad thing. Because really. Caring about others is for the week and feeble. Kill them off, I say! MURDER THEM FOR A BETTER TOMORROW.

They will carefully manage the primary so that it looks like a sorta kinda fair fight but the winner is preordained as Hillary Clinton.

Then I won't be voting Democrat. It's that simple.

I want a socialist.

I don't want (another) rank-and-file corporate-backed Democrat who will *** and moan and get in pissing contests with Republicans over things while still trying to please their bribe-givers "campaign donors."

It's why I think Trump wouldn't be the worst option of the GOP crowd. At least he's honest about his ***.

I'm pretty sure you lost something trimming a quote train, lol.

Nah. It was just largely in response to his "Sanders is a plant by the Dems to make Hillary look more palatable, but she's already confirmed" bit.

I'm not voting for Hillary. I'd love to see a woman president assuming that person is otherwise qualified, but I don't think someone who sat on Walmart's board is really the kind of person I trust to be "for the people."

With her and her ilk it's just saying the right things about social issues to keep the Dems happy and then playing ball with the same corporate *** who sponsor all the politicians.

Don't forget words that are merely qualifiers being presented as insults!

It's cute when people constantly say "socialist" like it's a bad thing. Because really. Caring about others is for the week and feeble. Kill them off, I say! MURDER THEM FOR A BETTER TOMORROW.

You say stuff like this and I'm really not sure if you actually believe the fundamental tenants of socialism include "caring for others" or if you're just voicing your own interpretation of it to mean such.

"Socialism."

Socialism is the stepping stone between capitalism and Communism.

Socialism is the stepping stone between capitalism and Communism.

You say stuff like this and I'm really not sure if you actually believe the fundamental tenants of socialism include "caring for others" or if you're just voicing your own interpretation of it to mean such.

Socialism is diametrically opposed to Communism, bud.

Need some word for it.

European socialism.

A rose by any other name...

Yeah. Except I'm on this continent. So I just said "socialism" and went ahead and assumed people would understand.

But you're right. I guess I shouldn't make assumptions.

Clearly I mean we should go back to Stalinist Russia, where we'd all be miserable and downtrodden. I obviously don't mean we should look to our allies in Europe and build on their successes and freedoms. You know. Like we did when we started this country.

The strength and efficiency of the government determines the success-fulness of your model. Only a strong authoritarian government can properly handle control of most of production, property, and resources.

Same goes with socialism. If you have an ineffective, corrupt, and prone to abuse government, socialism isn't going to be very effective and end up bankrupting the nation. Allowing the people who ruined it to get away with all the wealth too.

Germany is the only country in decent shape. Not going into all the details again, but when you think of socialism, you're thinking of Scandinavian countries. And their models would never work in the U.S. We've been over this.

The difference between euro socialism and ussr socialism is simply a matter of time. The well intended monopoly on resources by the state has always eventually been twisted into a tool of individual oppression.

The difference between euro socialism and ussr socialism is simply a matter of time. The well intended monopoly on resources by the state has always eventually been twisted into a tool of individual oppression.