|
15 questions for the evolutionists of AH.com
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-09-22 13:05:38
I believe in natural selection, thus I also believe that this thread is on borrowed time and half the posters within will likely suffer a stupidity-induced death.
Evolution is real, I will prove it.
I rest my case.
[+]
Fenrir.Atheryn
Server: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1665
By Fenrir.Atheryn 2014-09-22 13:05:43
In my world, there are no alphas or betas, just compatible and incompatible.
Remind me never to let you pilot a plane. We'll die because you can't read call signs to flight towers appropriately. @.@;
Towers shmowers. If I can see the runway, I'm goin' for it.
Lakshmi.Flavin
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2014-09-22 13:05:47
I was raised Catholic and I have no guilt over looking at a pari of titties... blame your own shitty insecurities!
See, this is the problem I end up with; and it's my own fault for constantly being down on religion. Jokes get taken as serious. As long as you realize its all your own fault. ^^
Fenrir.Atheryn
Server: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1665
By Fenrir.Atheryn 2014-09-22 13:06:42
In my world, there are no alphas or betas....
Yeah... in new zealand! .......... there are only sheep....and the men who are brave enough to love them!
New Zealand... Where the men are brave and the sheep are nervous.
Forum Moderator
Server: Excalibur
Game: FFXIV
Posts: 25981
By Anna Ruthven 2014-09-22 13:06:55
In my world, there are no alphas or betas....
Yeah... in new zealand! .......... there are only sheep....and the men who are brave enough to love them!
By Jetackuu 2014-09-22 13:07:30
lolwhat?
a lack of a belief is not a belief system
By Blazed1979 2014-09-22 13:09:14
how do you feel about men who stare at tid ol biddy cleavage? There is no harm in taking a look. Everyone with a sexual interest does it, including women(but women are 100 times better than men at being discrete when they check out someone). Actually, being looked at is often appreciated too.
The problem is staring. Staring at somneone causes uneasiness by itself, when the stare is sexual in nature too that's obviuosly even more bothersome.
Even worse when this happens while trying to have a conversation. If you are so distracted by my boobs that you can't even look away I'll think you're a beta male who's not in control and deem you bad mate material. You will then be able to stare at my *** instead as I walk away and ignore you the rest of my life.
Keep in mind also that women get this a lot, like everyday all the time. So eventually it becomes frustrating. I know a lot of women that are attracted to the Beta - a lot of them fuggin gorgeous too. I've been rejected by some of them and I AM PRIME! Then seen them get with the some dude with the worst hygiene, a high pitched voice, sagging man tiddies and hair growing from his chest outside his shirt's collar. /shrugg.
anyways, i brought it up with the context of feminism extremes - as we men are programed to appreciate big breasts and silky smooth long legs. I don't even realize I'm staring half the time until I get slapped or poked. And I am by no means a Beta.
- IQ check
- Looks check
- Income check
- Flashy car check
- Penis size decent enough
- Physical dominance check
- Respect of my peers check
- Have an entourage check
- funny Nope.
Women always go for the funny guy most. Alpha's stand no chance against a guy who makes girls laugh. He can smell like cow ***and have the personal hygiene of a baboon, but if he makes them laugh enough, he gets them.
If you have to call yourself an alpha, you're not an alpha.
What defines Alpha?
By Jetackuu 2014-09-22 13:09:50
Quetzalcoatl.Maldini said: »
I would like to add that Muslim or groups of Muslim or groups who identify themselves as muslim =/= Islam.
Fenrir.Atheryn
Server: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1665
By Fenrir.Atheryn 2014-09-22 13:11:08
If you have to call yourself an alpha, you're not an alpha.
What defines Alpha?
Someone who (a) believes they're in a race; and (b) thinks they're winning.
By Blazed1979 2014-09-22 13:14:17
If you have to call yourself an alpha, you're not an alpha.
What defines Alpha?
Someone who (a) believes they're in a race; and (b) thinks they're winning.
I've always been the Alpha, except on these forums. I like that however as it makes me challenge myself when arguing, debating. In real life people just bend over or look away when I challenge them and I rarely get challenged.
My money, my physical appearance, my reputation don't work here or give me any advantage. Its one of the things I enjoyed benefiting by playing my first MMO FFXI. Had to learn social skills I didn't pick up in life because people never bothered challenging me.
If there's a race, I stopped running it a long time ago though. Around 30
By Nazrious 2014-09-22 13:14:32
I like Beta fish they are pretty.
There is also no such thing as an Alpha male or Beta male.
There are Men and Women, then girls and boys. Just because you got a hair down there and/ or are old enough to retire does not make you a Man/Woman just older.
One of the main reason for rights of passages was to get rid of the so called "Men" you passed or died or if lucky survived to try again. But society leads to stagnation.
Before we get into the omg cave man nonsense, real survival in a primitive environment is crazy hard both physically and mentally.
But I digress, Beta fish are cool.
Valefor.Sehachan
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2014-09-22 13:20:23
You guys put too much emphasis on the definition. A word is only a mean to communicate, when I say alpha it doesn't mean there are only two types of men.
It's a different thing entirely. It's about the way you face the various situations.
Someone who (a) believes they're in a race; and (b) thinks they're winning. This for example, has nothing to do with what I was talking about. At all.
Additionally, a guy who is a complete *** is not an alpha. Alpha men can be romantic and passionate as well.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 125
By Asura.Triffle 2014-09-22 13:20:33
lolwhat?
a lack of a belief is not a belief system
Atheism is a belief system like abstinence is a sex position.
[+]
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20130
By Shiva.Nikolce 2014-09-22 13:21:21
I've always been the Alpha, except on these forums....
did anyone else sense a yaoi story was coming and went to get popcorn?
By Blazed1979 2014-09-22 13:22:31
You guys put too much emphasis on the definition. A word is only a mean to communicate, when I say alpha it doesn't mean there are only two types of men.
It's a different thing entirely. It's about the way you face the various situations.
Someone who (a) believes they're in a race; and (b) thinks they're winning. This for example, has nothing to do with what I was talking about. At all.
Additionally, a guy who is a complete *** is not an alpha. Alpha men can be romantic and passionate as well.
The way I've always seen it is as follows:
Would my dad kick his dad's ***?
Valefor.Sehachan
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2014-09-22 13:22:38
I've always been the Alpha, except on these forums....
did anyone else sense a yaoi story was coming and went to get popcorn? Are you seme or uke? A test to discover if you're going to be the active or the passive guy!
By fonewear 2014-09-22 13:24:57
[+]
By Nazrious 2014-09-22 13:25:37
lolwhat?
a lack of a belief is not a belief system
Atheism is a belief system like abstinence is a sex position.
Atheism is a belief system.
A person believes there is no God, gods.
They shape their lives and thinking based on said belief.
Thus a system is created based off that belief.
Atheism = Belief system.
Often a Atheist is the most vocal and staunchest supporter of their beliefs, and usually don't even recognize it.
By Jetackuu 2014-09-22 13:26:20
lolwhat?
a lack of a belief is not a belief system
Atheism is a belief system like abstinence is a sex position.
I was going to try to assert another metaphor for this, but I'm chuckling at that one a bit too much. To be fair though, some people don't consider anything but coitus to be sex, aka penis in vagina. While others consider anything involving sexual organs to be sex.; hj, bj, zj, sodomy, etc.
But I digress, and will go chuckle more.
Valefor.Sehachan
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2014-09-22 13:26:55
Often a Atheist is the most vocal and staunchest supporter of their beliefs I disagree. I've never had atheists come bother me to talk to me about the non existence of God.
It happens almost on a daily bases with theists.
[+]
Phoenix.Sehachan
Server: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13352
By Phoenix.Sehachan 2014-09-22 13:27:56
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-09-22 13:28:53
Valefor.Sehachan
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2014-09-22 13:29:38
I'll remain with the doubt of whether I've ever done this.
By Nazrious 2014-09-22 13:29:44
Often a Atheist is the most vocal and staunchest supporter of their beliefs I disagree. I've never had atheists come bother me to talk to me about the non existence of God.
It happens almost on a daily bases with theists.
Nah they are smarter about it and lobby/ bribe congress and also run PR campaign as well as make test cases hoping to get before the Supreme Court.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-09-22 13:31:42
I'll remain with the doubt of whether I've ever done this. Damn girl, you are kinky!
By Blazed1979 2014-09-22 13:31:51
I've always been the Alpha, except on these forums....
did anyone else sense a yaoi story was coming and went to get popcorn? Are you seme or uke? A test to discover if you're going to be the active or the passive guy!
You are a Don't *** With Me Seme!Serious and to the point, and sometimes bordering on the sadistic, it takes a special breed of uke to satisfy your needs. You tend to be anti-social with little patience for most people. You need someone to challenge you and push you to your limits, and then be able to take your intense reactions, which possibly involves rope and sensual torture. This is what makes the Badass Uke the yin for your yang, as you're the only one able to put them in line and satisfy each other.
Most compatible with: Badass Uke
Least compatible with: Dramatic Uke, Innocent Uke, Clueless Uke
What seme or uke are you? Take the experience at SemeUke.com, or get yaoi merchandise..
By Ramyrez 2014-09-22 13:32:59
"If you have to ask, you can't afford it."
[+]
By fonewear 2014-09-22 13:33:48
If I have to ask I want to try it.
[+]
By Ramyrez 2014-09-22 13:34:36
Not familiar with this subculture at all, but
You are a Chibi Seme
You are the seme in disguise. Able to fit in and get along with uke and seme alike, you are able to get close to the uke on their level before exerting your dominance. This makes you at times manipulative and able to fool others about your true seme nature. Because of your harmless appearance, it takes the flamboyant Flaming Uke to match wits and really bring out your aggressive side to expose you for the seme that you are. <br>
Most compatible with: Flaming Uke, Badass Uke
Least compatible with: Dramatic Uke
What seme or uke are you? Take the experience at SemeUke.com, or get yaoi merchandise..
1.) How did life originate? Evolutionist Professor Paul Davies admitted, “Nobody knows how a mixture of lifeless chemicals spontaneously organized themselves into the first living cell.”1 Andrew Knoll, professor of biology, Harvard, said, “we don’t really know how life originated on this planet”.2 A minimal cell needs several hundred proteins. Even if every atom in the universe were an experiment with all the correct amino acids present for every possible molecular vibration in the supposed evolutionary age of the universe, not even one average-sized functional protein would form. So how did life with hundreds of proteins originate just by chemistry without intelligent design?
2.) How did the DNA code originate? The code is a sophisticated language system with letters and words where the meaning of the words is unrelated to the chemical properties of the letters—just as the information on this page is not a product of the chemical properties of the ink (or pixels on a screen). What other coding system has existed without intelligent design? How did the DNA coding system arise without it being created?
3.) How could mutations—accidental copying mistakes (DNA ‘letters’ exchanged, deleted or added, genes duplicated, chromosome inversions, etc.)—create the huge volumes of information in the DNA of living things? How could such errors create 3 billion letters of DNA information to change a microbe into a microbiologist? There is information for how to make proteins but also for controlling their use—much like a cookbook contains the ingredients as well as the instructions for how and when to use them. One without the other is useless. See: Meta-information: An impossible conundrum for evolution. Mutations are known for their destructive effects, including over 1,000 human diseases such as hemophilia. Rarely are they even helpful. But how can scrambling existing DNA information create a new biochemical pathway or nano-machines with many components, to make ‘goo-to-you’ evolution possible? E.g., How did a 32-component rotary motor like ATP synthase (which produces the energy currency, ATP, for all life), or robots like kinesin (a ‘postman’ delivering parcels inside cells) originate?
4.) Why is natural selection, a principle recognized by creationists, taught as ‘evolution’, as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life? By definition it is a selective process (selecting from already existing information), so is not a creative process. It might explain the survival of the fittest (why certain genes benefit creatures more in certain environments), but not the arrival of the fittest (where the genes and creatures came from in the first place). The death of individuals not adapted to an environment and the survival of those that are suited does not explain the origin of the traits that make an organism adapted to an environment. E.g., how do minor back-and-forth variations in finch beaks explain the origin of beaks or finches? How does natural selection explain goo-to-you evolution?
5.) How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate? (This video simply explains the concept of a short biochemical pathway.) Every pathway and nano-machine requires multiple protein/enzyme components to work. How did lucky accidents create even one of the components, let alone 10 or 20 or 30 at the same time, often in a necessary programmed sequence. Evolutionary biochemist Franklin Harold wrote, “we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, only a variety of wishful speculations.”3
6.) Living things look like they were designed, so how do evolutionists know that they were not designed? Richard Dawkins wrote, “biology is the study of complicated things that have the appearance of having been designed with a purpose.”4 Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of the double helix structure of DNA, wrote, “Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved.”5 The problem for evolutionists is that living things show too much design. Who objects when an archaeologist says that pottery points to human design? Yet if someone attributes the design in living things to a designer, that is not acceptable. Why should science be restricted to naturalistic causes rather than logical causes?
7.) How did multi-cellular life originate? How did cells adapted to individual survival ‘learn’ to cooperate and specialize (including undergoing programmed cell death) to create complex plants and animals?
8.) How did sex originate? Asexual reproduction gives up to twice as much reproductive success (‘fitness’) for the same resources as sexual reproduction, so how could the latter ever gain enough advantage to be selected? And how could mere physics and chemistry invent the complementary apparatuses needed at the same time (non-intelligent processes cannot plan for future coordination of male and female organs).
9.) Why are the (expected) countless millions of transitional fossils missing? Darwin noted the problem and it still remains. The evolutionary family trees in textbooks are based on imagination, not fossil evidence. Famous Harvard paleontologist (and evolutionist), Stephen Jay Gould, wrote, “The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology”.6 Other evolutionist fossil experts also acknowledge the problem.
10.) How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years, if evolution has changed worms into humans in the same time frame? Professor Gould wrote, “the maintenance of stability within species must be considered as a major evolutionary problem.”7
11.) How did blind chemistry create mind/ intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality? If everything evolved, and we invented God, as per evolutionary teaching, what purpose or meaning is there to human life? Should students be learning nihilism (life is meaningless) in science classes?
12.) Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated? Evolutionists often use flexible story-telling to ‘explain’ observations contrary to evolutionary theory. NAS(USA) member Dr Philip Skell wrote, “Darwinian explanations for such things are often too supple: Natural selection makes humans self-centered and aggressive—except when it makes them altruistic and peaceable. Or natural selection produces virile men who eagerly spread their seed—except when it prefers men who are faithful protectors and providers. When an explanation is so supple that it can explain any behavior, it is difficult to test it experimentally, much less use it as a catalyst for scientific discovery.”8
13.) Where are the scientific breakthroughs due to evolution? Dr Marc Kirschner, chair of the Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, stated: “In fact, over the last 100 years, almost all of biology has proceeded independent of evolution, except evolutionary biology itself. Molecular biology, biochemistry, physiology, have not taken evolution into account at all.”9 Dr Skell wrote, “It is our knowledge of how these organisms actually operate, not speculations about how they may have arisen millions of years ago, that is essential to doctors, veterinarians, farmers … .”10 Evolution actually hinders medical discovery.11 Then why do schools and universities teach evolution so dogmatically, stealing time from experimental biology that so benefits humankind?
14.) Science involves experimenting to figure out how things work; how they operate. Why is evolution, a theory about history, taught as if it is the same as this operational science? You cannot do experiments, or even observe what happened, in the past. Asked if evolution has been observed, Richard Dawkins said, “Evolution has been observed. It’s just that it hasn’t been observed while it’s happening.”12
15.) Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes? Karl Popper, famous philosopher of science, said “Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical [religious] research programme ….”13 Michael Ruse, evolutionist science philosopher admitted, “Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.”14 If “you can’t teach religion in science classes”, why is evolution taught?
|
|