The New Global Cooling Thread.
|
The new Global Cooling thread.
Bahamut.Kara said: » Where did you come up with this assumption?
[+]
Global cooling? LOL
I hate hot weather would be nice for it to be winter all year round mwah-hahahahahahahahaha.
[+]
Cerberus.Pleebo said: » It's because I haven't directly answered their irrelevant question. Whatever my education is has absolutely nothing to do with the argument, but they've latched on to that like it matters. Agreed. If you have qualifications it doesn't make you right, if you don't, it doesn't make you wrong. What I can say is that you've demonstrated an advanced working knowledge of the materials discussed, cite sources, dissect opposing views or "data" with accurate and scientific approaches.
[+]
Ragnarok.Sekundes said: » Cerberus.Pleebo said: » It's because I haven't directly answered their irrelevant question. Whatever my education is has absolutely nothing to do with the argument, but they've latched on to that like it matters. Agreed. If you have qualifications it doesn't make you right, if you don't, it doesn't make you wrong. What I can say is that you've demonstrated an advanced working knowledge of the materials discussed, cite sources, dissect opposing views or "data" with accurate and scientific approaches. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA I seem to remember Pleebo being on the "don't burn the water in the Ocean cause we'll use it all up" team. That was the moment I ceased to take seriously anything said about science by him (and a few others). Who knows where he's going to end up without your validation
[+]
Burn the water in the ocean? Can you link me to this conversation?
Ok here's the thing I don't get. People keep debating if global warming is real or not but do any these people actually think filling the air and environment with pollution isn't a bad thing?
When my dad was a kid in the 50s they thought it did no harm so they could dump as much into the water as they wanted. The rivers and stream around here would have dead fish washed up all along the banks. The water was so toxic they couldn't go swimming in it and it took decades to get cleaned up. There still signs saying that you shouldn't eat fish from them and in places not swim.
[+]
Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Bahamut.Kara said: » Where did you come up with this assumption? Hence the term 'University of Google.' You solely rely on the + system here to determine whether you're right or wrong. Or even if you should reply. Science is not a democracy of popularity.
[+]
Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Bahamut.Kara said: » Where did you come up with this assumption? Hence the term 'University of Google.' You solely rely on the + system here to determine whether you're right or wrong. Or even if you should reply. Science is not a democracy of popularity. You are correct Science is a religion for people that hate religion. It has the same if not worse level of bias and blind devotion that some religious people display.
[+]
fonewear said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Bahamut.Kara said: » Where did you come up with this assumption? Hence the term 'University of Google.' You solely rely on the + system here to determine whether you're right or wrong. Or even if you should reply. Science is not a democracy of popularity. You are correct Science is a religion for people that hate religion. It has the same if not worse level of bias and blind devotion that some religious people display.
[+]
If there was a church of global warming it would be packed every Sunday night with people professing they found the correct "theory" and other Scientists applauding and patting each other on the back.
[+]
A better term would be Groupthink Science.
[+]
If Science took itself any more serious it would die of smugness.
[+]
Ragnarok.Sekundes said: » Cerberus.Pleebo said: » It's because I haven't directly answered their irrelevant question. Whatever my education is has absolutely nothing to do with the argument, but they've latched on to that like it matters. Agreed. If you have qualifications it doesn't make you right, if you don't, it doesn't make you wrong. What I can say is that you've demonstrated an advanced working knowledge of the materials discussed, cite sources, dissect opposing views or "data" with accurate and scientific approaches. Rofl! It's said by one who frequently references "97% of scientists agree" and refuses to listen to skeptics because they didn't get their appropriate "learn" on. Cerberus.Pleebo said: » It's because I haven't directly answered their irrelevant question. Whatever my education is has absolutely nothing to do with the argument, but they've latched on to that like it matters. I think you should just agree to go out on a date and get it over with...
[+]
I would pay good money to see pleebo on a date with KN. Lets start up a kick-starter!
[+]
I don't know. I'm still waiting for the 'Romy and Michelle' remake starring Aman and KN. Priorities, man. Priorities.
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » I would pay good money to see pleebo on a date with KN. Lets start up a kick-starter! Leviathan.Chaosx said: » It actually does matter when you put into question the degrees of real scientists have but failed to show any formal education in anything remotely related to science. Hence the term 'University of Google.' You solely rely on the + system here to determine whether you're right or wrong. Or even if you should reply. Science is not a democracy of popularity. Since we're all gathered together again, would you mind filling me on your thought on the bias correction methodology and rationale I presented as a counterargument? It seems my original questions directed to you and King have been lost among the kerfuffle. Bahamut.Ravael said: » Burn the water in the ocean? Can you link me to this conversation? Ragnarok.Nausi said: » I would pay good money to see pleebo on a date with KN. Lets start up a kick-starter! "Well, an exciting thing happened at work today. I was working on a client's tax returns and ---" "Hold that thought, King. There's something I have to take care of." 
[+]
Aw.. Pleebo at least you make despising you entertaining.
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Aw.. Pleebo at least you make despising you entertaining. Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » I would pay good money to see pleebo on a date with KN. Lets start up a kick-starter! "Well, an exciting thing happened at work today. I was working on a client's tax returns and ---" "Hold that thought, King. There's something I have to take care of." I suspect that is how all of KN's dates start/end
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » I would pay good money to see pleebo on a date with KN. Lets start up a kick-starter! As long as man remains unable to accurately predict the natural variability in the earth's climate there will be no way of measuring the potency of greenhouse gasses.
fonewear said: »
[+]
I'm not sure what you mean by that. Natural forcings have been reliably modeled before. Cooling resulting from the Mt. Pinatubo eruption was successfully predicted by climate models, and variations in things like solar irradiation are included in today's calculations. The potency of GH gases (that is, how much each gas contributes to the GH effect) was experimentally verified decades ago.
[+]
Cerberus.Pleebo said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » I would pay good money to see pleebo on a date with KN. Lets start up a kick-starter! "Well, an exciting thing happened at work today. I was working on a client's tax returns and ---" "Hold that thought, King. There's something I have to take care of." Promise you would do that if I told you about my exciting day today? I would be more than happy to tell you if you do that. |
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.