It actually does matter when you put into question the degrees of real scientists have but failed to show any formal education in anything remotely related to science.
Hence the term 'University of Google.'
You solely rely on the + system here to determine whether you're right or wrong. Or even if you should reply.
Science is not a democracy of popularity.
Please point out any post where I questioned anyone's degree. (Warning: This will be difficult to do as it never happened.) I questioned their ideas and expressed statements and have countered them with cited facts. You know, much like I did on my very first post in this thread.
Since we're all gathered together again, would you mind filling me on your thought on the bias correction methodology and rationale I presented as a counterargument? It seems my original questions directed to you and King have been lost among the kerfuffle.
Burn the water in the ocean? Can you link me to this conversation?
It got nuked apparently. Too bad though. Was looking forward to pointing out how wrong Saevel is again.