Eyjafjallajokull
Eyjafjallajokull
Eyjafjallajokull
Eyjafjallajokull!~
Random Politics & Religion #00
|
Random Politics & Religion #00
That's the name I'd chose if I had a baby!
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » No one's denying the earth's climate is changing, it's always changing. Plenty are denying it, or conflating climate and weather, etc. But, it's not specifically that it's changing, it's the rate it's changing. For a person who claims there are so many holes in the theory, you sure don't seem to have a *** clue what any of them are. Well that's the point. To the extent we can know how the climate changes we really can't with any certainty say: 1) That the climate is changing outside a "reasonable" rate. 2) That the change that is occurring is due to our emission of CO2. I mean the climate changes at a faster rate when a volcano goes off, than what the alarmists are claiming man has done. Climate scientist know a lot more than you think. Volcanoes are a natural occurrence, something we have no control over. Pumping millions of tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere every year with industry and transportation is something we do have control over. What's more, there are much cleaner alternatives that aren't getting the research and development they should because big oil has lobbied against them. Don't mistake your lack of knowledge for everyone bring ignorant of climate science.
[+]
I really need to learn one of those languages, man. Those hardass take-over-the-world-with-axes-and-fire languages.
Swedish is a very easy language, even more so for a native english speaker.
[+]
Valefor.Sehachan said: » Swedish is a very easy language, even more so for a native english speaker. Languages are not my forte. Still, I should give it a go.
[+]
Valefor.Sehachan said: » Swedish is a very easy language, even more so for a native english speaker. *sigh* Anything to meet hot Swedish singles! *pirates Rosetta Stone* Ramyrez said: » I really need to learn one of those languages, man. Those hardass take-over-the-world-with-axes-and-fire languages. Valefor.Sehachan said: » Swedish is a very easy language, even more so for a native english speaker. Here is a norweigen TV show making fun of Danish YouTube Video Placeholder
[+]
Odin.Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » No one's denying the earth's climate is changing, it's always changing. Plenty are denying it, or conflating climate and weather, etc. But, it's not specifically that it's changing, it's the rate it's changing. For a person who claims there are so many holes in the theory, you sure don't seem to have a *** clue what any of them are. Well that's the point. To the extent we can know how the climate changes we really can't with any certainty say: 1) That the climate is changing outside a "reasonable" rate. 2) That the change that is occurring is due to our emission of CO2. I mean the climate changes at a faster rate when a volcano goes off, than what the alarmists are claiming man has done. Climate scientist know a lot more than you think. Volcanoes are a natural occurrence, something we have no control over. Pumping millions of tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere every year with industry and transportation is something we do have control over. What's more, there are much cleaner alternatives that aren't getting the research and development they should because big oil has lobbied against them. Don't mistake your lack of knowledge for everyone bring ignorant of climate science. They do huh? Can you point to any one of their models that has accurately predicted atmospheric temperature in the last 30 years? Of course you can't. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » No one's denying the earth's climate is changing, it's always changing. Plenty are denying it, or conflating climate and weather, etc. But, it's not specifically that it's changing, it's the rate it's changing. For a person who claims there are so many holes in the theory, you sure don't seem to have a *** clue what any of them are. Well that's the point. To the extent we can know how the climate changes we really can't with any certainty say: 1) That the climate is changing outside a "reasonable" rate. 2) That the change that is occurring is due to our emission of CO2. I mean the climate changes at a faster rate when a volcano goes off, than what the alarmists are claiming man has done. Climate scientist know a lot more than you think. Volcanoes are a natural occurrence, something we have no control over. Pumping millions of tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere every year with industry and transportation is something we do have control over. What's more, there are much cleaner alternatives that aren't getting the research and development they should because big oil has lobbied against them. Don't mistake your lack of knowledge for everyone bring ignorant of climate science. They do huh? Can you point to any one of their models that has accurately predicted atmospheric temperature in the last 30 years? Of course you can't. Numerous people have linked an obnoxious amount of information including raw data and you refuse to even look at it. You have decided to accept a level of ignorance on the subject, and we're all sick of spoon-feeding you information. Odin.Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Odin.Jassik said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » No one's denying the earth's climate is changing, it's always changing. Plenty are denying it, or conflating climate and weather, etc. But, it's not specifically that it's changing, it's the rate it's changing. For a person who claims there are so many holes in the theory, you sure don't seem to have a *** clue what any of them are. Well that's the point. To the extent we can know how the climate changes we really can't with any certainty say: 1) That the climate is changing outside a "reasonable" rate. 2) That the change that is occurring is due to our emission of CO2. I mean the climate changes at a faster rate when a volcano goes off, than what the alarmists are claiming man has done. Climate scientist know a lot more than you think. Volcanoes are a natural occurrence, something we have no control over. Pumping millions of tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere every year with industry and transportation is something we do have control over. What's more, there are much cleaner alternatives that aren't getting the research and development they should because big oil has lobbied against them. Don't mistake your lack of knowledge for everyone bring ignorant of climate science. They do huh? Can you point to any one of their models that has accurately predicted atmospheric temperature in the last 30 years? Of course you can't. Numerous people have linked an obnoxious amount of information including raw data and you refuse to even look at it. You have decided to accept a level of ignorance on the subject, and we're all sick of spoon-feeding you information. No they haven't. No one has produced an accurate climate model in the past thirty years. Put up or shut up. SHOW ME THE TRANSITIONAL FOSSILS
[+]
A climate model, accurate or not, in no way invalidates climate scientists. Its just something nausi has latched onto because he doesn't know anything else.
I'll transition your fossils!
[+]
Shiva.Viciousss said: » A climate model, accurate or not, in no way invalidates climate scientists. Its just something nausi has latched onto because he doesn't know anything else. Here comes vic desperately reaching to invalidate my measure of proof. Like asking to be on the Olympic sprint team when the best you can do is run a 10 minute mile. Live from the climate model reading:
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » A climate model, accurate or not, in no way invalidates climate scientists. Its just something nausi has latched onto because he doesn't know anything else. Here comes vic desperately reaching to invalidate my measure of proof. Like asking to be on the Olympic sprint team when the best you can do is run a 10 minute mile. Nausi using the word proof is hilarious. The guy has never posted a source in his life. One person's measure of proof has no impact on the actual topic. Choosing not to believe something has no impact on science. Shiva.Viciousss said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » A climate model, accurate or not, in no way invalidates climate scientists. Its just something nausi has latched onto because he doesn't know anything else. Here comes vic desperately reaching to invalidate my measure of proof. Like asking to be on the Olympic sprint team when the best you can do is run a 10 minute mile. Nausi using the word proof is hilarious. The guy has never posted a source in his life. One person's measure of proof has no impact on the actual topic. Choosing not to believe something has no impact on science. When does the poo-flinging start vic? Feel free to contest the claim with facts nausi, for once.
Shiva.Viciousss said: » The guy has never posted a source in his life. That's weird, coming from a guy who's had one post with a source in the past two months. I bow to you, Sourcemaster.
[+]
Considering he has made less than 300 posts in 2 months (not going to go through each one), not too bad.
Bahamut.Ravael said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » The guy has never posted a source in his life. That's weird, coming from a guy who's had one post with a source in the past two months. I bow to you, Sourcemaster. Since you looked, how many posts do I have in this section in the last two months? I'm guessing less than 100, unless there is a major topic I am forgetting. Shiva.Viciousss said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » The guy has never posted a source in his life. That's weird, coming from a guy who's had one post with a source in the past two months. I bow to you, Sourcemaster. Since you looked, how many posts do I have in this section in the last two months? I'm guessing less than 100, unless there is a major topic I am forgetting. You've made enough unsubstantiated claims in the past without caring to back any of it up. Jet's worse, but at least he owns up to his laziness.
[+]
Caitsith.Shiroi said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » No they haven't. No one has produced an accurate climate model in the past thirty years. Put up or shut up. False. And yet another "nuh uh" without any substance or link. Come on guys, at least try. If you're going to call Nausi out for not sourcing his claims, at least have the dignity to link one yourself.
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: » Caitsith.Shiroi said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » No they haven't. No one has produced an accurate climate model in the past thirty years. Put up or shut up. False. And yet another "nuh uh" without any substance or link. Come on guys, at least try. If you're going to call Nausi out for not sourcing his claims, at least have the dignity to link one yourself. You keep thinking that people have to cite common knowledge or when refuting an absurd claim that has no backing. You're better than that. Also, go farm me gil. |
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.