fonewear said: »
No. Obama IS THE LAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW.
Random Politics & Religion #00
|
Random Politics & Religion #00
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: » If you guys take up Muskets against Obama, I volunteer to be the dude playing a song as we march into battle. I've always dreamed of being killed mid-song by some dude who thought it was cool to bayonet the music man. Hm, now should I do drums or a bugle. KAZOO! I always wanted to kill someone playing a kazoo... with a bayonet
[+]
I read the Constitution once. I don't remember reading about using the commerce clause as an excuse to force people to buy Healthcare.
But that's none of my business.jpg fonewear said: » I read the Constitution once. I don't remember reading about using the commerce clause as an excuse to force people to buy Healthcare. But that's none of my business.jpg This is stupid. I still laughed anyhow. Where is that Constitutional expert guy. He will set the record straight.
I'm sure everyone here studies the Constitution daily. fonewear said: » Where is that Constitutional expert guy. He will set the record straight. I'm sure everyone here studies the Constitution daily. Lorgrim? He's probably already charging up the white house steps with a musket...
[+]
I read the Constitution once.
Then I fell asleep.
[+]
Shiva.Nikolce said: » fonewear said: » Where is that Constitutional expert guy. He will set the record straight. I'm sure everyone here studies the Constitution daily. Lorgrim? He's probably already charging up the white house steps with a musket... WAIT GOVERNMENT SCUM. I need to reload. Seriously wait. It's what George Washington would have wanted.
[+]
Sure Nausi, we will just take your word for it Obama wears
[+]
I thought trans gender bathrooms discussion was a new low but I think banning bullets might have replaced that !
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Shiva.Viciousss said: » Sure Nausi, we will just take your word for it Seriously. How often do I agree with Nausi? Pretty sure it sort of circumvents the intent of the Constitution if weapons aren't prohibited, but the means by which they're made useful is. Ammo wasn't sold when the Constitution was written, thats why there is nothing in there regarding the distribution of it.
Are we really going to discuss bullets in the Constitution...*pours myself a drink of Scotch*
I guess I don't understand. Is there no other type of ammunition available for this weapon?
5.56 is the caliber, the ATF is working on banning the armor piercing variant, again, totally legal. The NRA is going to have to present something other than hurt feelings if they are going to contest it.
Banning the sale of the bullets has the effect of disarming the gun's owner. If it happens it will be overturned by the Courts just like the President's most recent lawlessness on immigration. The executive branch outright refusing to enforce laws passed by the legislative branch and signed into law by the executive branch has the effect of creating a law.
We still have over a year and a half of this bozo. I can't imagine the ***he is going to try in his last year. Vic has already pre-agreed with it all no matter what it is.
[+]
Why stop at 5.56 9mm .357 etc !
Aman is delusional as usual. Banning one specific bullet just means they will have to use a different one, the horror!
I'm still hoping we can go back in time and ban the musket !
Phoenix.Amandarius said: » Banning the sale of the bullets has the effect of disarming the gun's owner. If it happens it will be overturned by the Courts just like the President's most recent lawlessness on immigration. If only the courts had done the same thing for Incandescent light bulbs. Damn it Dubbya! *shakes fist*
[+]
Shiva.Viciousss said: » Aman is delusional as usual. Banning one specific bullet just means they will have to use a different one, the horror! It's the camel's nose in the tent. You know this. I still love the logic that a guy who is in the frame of mind to shoot at a cop is also going to be concerned with the legality of his weapon & ammunition.
[+]
Shiva.Viciousss said: » Aman is delusional as usual. Banning one specific bullet just means they will have to use a different one, the horror! It looks to me like the entire caliber is being banned. Which would have the effect of banning the weapon that uses the caliber. And it's really stupid to do it that way, for one, just on principle. For two, especially since that type of firearm isn't very prevelant in gun violence, it's not going help a god damn thing in practice. It's partisan bandstanding to drum up support among the party-line fools. First they came for our bullets. Then they came for our casings. Then they came for our lead. Then they came for our powder.
Seriously, beer! |
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.