Phoenix.Amandarius said:
»She's not even good at pretending she has feelings though. I really don't get this one. Seriously. She has no history of leadership. She is divisive. She has a long history of corruption. She is disgustingly rich and selfish. She defended child sex offenders as a lawyer. She was a Wal-Mart executive. She is heartless and her laughter makes people shiver. I will never understand the liberal attraction to Hillary.
It has nothing to do with qualifications, past history, policies, or anything that would remotely be considered a decent skill in leadership.
2016 is all about electing a woman, regardless of anything else other than being a woman.
Just like 2008 was about electing the black guy, 2016 is about electing a woman.
Unfortunately in order for the GOP to be in the running, they're going to have a woman running as well.
If the GOP was smart, they would need to one up the democrats and run an openly gay man. Hell if they had a transsexual running that would guarantee them 8 years.
In case you haven't picked up on it by now, presidential elections for the next 16 years at least will be all about genitals, sexual orientation, and gender identity.
Consequently, this is a result of a sexually repressed society. It was inevitable.
Sex sells, regardless of whether or not it applies to you personally. I would speculate after this trend takes its course, the next trend will be to elect people of a different ethnicity and nationality. Expect to see some overlap as we saw with Obama already.
We already had a republican government who attempted to change the Constitution to allow non native born citizens to run for president.
Qualifications...? Just need to fit the trend.
Speak ill of this? You're racist, sexist, homophobic, a bigot, etc.
Welcome to the Fourth Reich.