Random Politics & Religion #00

Yeah, anyone carrying a pistol that large open I assume is trying to make a statement. Couple that with an attitude and I generally just nope out.

A shot in the back is just a more obvious indicator of whether it was defensive.

Lol...

LOL

Anything more than a .40 S&W is excessive for carry, anything more than 3"-4" is cumbersome for carry.

Also, I think it's funny how someone will down a 9mm as "weak" while carrying a revolver with .38 Special +P. 9mm is fairly close to .357 Magnum, close enough that comparing is pointless...yet their +P is "weaker" >.>

I carry a Glock 43 single stack 9mm. It's nice and small and works great with a IWB holster

I thought about posting about it but people made it clear the past weeks they don't care much about the topic anymore.

Nonetheless it's a very important thing cause Iran is shia and got all colours of mad at this(along with Hezbollah and a bunch of other groups around the muslim world). Honestly Saudi could have avoided this, you know very well what kind of reaction you get, you should have just kept him prisoner. Makes you wonder about their intentions(or just lack of thoughtfulness).

No, not lawful. I knew a guy in high school who broke into a guy's house and was shot in the back. I didn't follow the court case that followed but given that OK is pretty *** up when it comes to laws, it could've gone either way but no, a shot in the back isn't self defense and if you shoot someone for ringing your doorbell and running, you don't need a gun, you need mental help.

Nearly 200 Muslim workers have been fired from a Cargill meatpacking plant in Colorado, for walking out after a dispute over prayer breaks.

Praying five times a day is a must for many Muslims.

But Tony Aden says missing even one of those prayers over a break time dispute caused him and many others to walk away from their jobs.

"It don't matter if I don't have a job, my religion is more important," Aden told CBS News.

Cargill spokesperson Michael Martin says prayer is allowed. But he says a misunderstanding of company policy came on December 18th, when 11 workers asked for a break to pray at the same time.

"Coming from that specific work area would have disrupted the workflow so the supervisor told the employees that they could go pray, but they would have to go in smaller numbers than 11," Martin told CBS News. "It would have to be three at a time."

The following Monday, nearly 200 employees from the Muslim community didn't show up to work for three consecutive days. The company fired them all.

"There are times when accommodation is not possible," Martin said. "But in an overwhelming majority of instances, we do everything we can to ensure sure that we do accommodate employees."

Jaylani Hussein represents 150 workers who are now without a job.

"Now we are getting supervisors who are telling our clients to go home if they wanted to pray," Hussein said. "If they are denied their basic rights to practice their faith reasonably at their employment, they seem to be losing one of the basic fundamental rights."

Cargill is now hiring to fill the shoes of those who walked out.

Areas have been set up at Cargill since 2009 to accommodate anyone who requested time to pray.

The Council on American Islamic Relations is currently working reach an agreement with Cargill so that those fired workers can return.

Looks like there's about 200 job openings now at a meatpacking plant in Colorado.

Hundreds of Muslim workers fired after dispute over prayers

Where I come from, not showing up for work for 3 days is called "quitting" not "fired"

Where I come from, not showing up for work for 3 days is called "quitting" not "fired"

Religious freedom: not for "those" people

My religion says pleebo has to pay me 1 million dollars a year,.

When shall I pick up my check Pleebo? Or don't you believe in freedom of religion?

My religion says pleebo has to pay me 1 million dollars a year,.

When shall I pick up my check Pleebo? Or don't you believe in freedom of religion?

That is moronic.

Wasn't there some huge deal about some government employee that refused to marry gay people the other day? I see a lot of the same people that were against her now defending these Muslims at this work place for doing the same thing she did.

Freedom of religion doesn't excuse you from doing your job that you are payed to do.

Wasn't there some huge deal about some government employee that refused to marry gay people the other day? I see a lot of the same people that were against her now defending these Muslims at this work place for doing the same thing she did.

If your religion prevents you from working then maybe that is a personal problem and not your employers problem.

It doesn't fit their narrative and thus isn't politically correct.

They got angry at that lady not because she's religious but because she's a Christian and they really don't like her kind. The left has a huge bias against Christians and is ambivalent to the rest. It's a left over from the Soviet subversion of the Democrat party. Religious identify, specifically Christian religious identity, was one of the things the Soviets needed to crumble before they could start a civil war in the USA to use as an opportunity for invasion. Since a full scale conflict would inevitably involve nukes, they needed a civil war to happen first so as to prevent nuclear retaliation.

The subversion was never completed and the Soviet Union collapsed before any civil war could be started, but the scars of the ideological infiltration still remain.

Religious freedom: not for "those" people

It doesn't fit their narrative and thus isn't politically correct.

They got angry at that lady not because she's religious but because she's a Christian and they really don't like her kind. The left has a huge bias against Christians and is ambivalent to the rest. It's a left over from the Soviet subversion of the Democrat party. Religious identify, specifically Christian religious identity, was one of the things the Soviets needed to crumble before they could start a civil war in the USA to use as an opportunity for invasion. Since a full scale conflict would inevitably involve nukes, they needed a civil war to happen first so as to prevent nuclear retaliation.

The subversion was never completed and the Soviet Union collapsed before any civil war could be started, but the scars of the ideological infiltration still remain.