U.S. Climate Has Already Changed, Study Finds

Unlike you, I have the humility to not post in topics I am not very familiar with. Unlike you, I don't embarrass myself for pages and pages saying absolutely nothing. Do I believe humans have had an effect on the environment? Absolutely. Have I put time into researching it further? Nope. Good attempt, but your attack failed. Keep being the site ***.

I get my news from the internet.

I get my news hand delivered to me in the form of a Giant floating spaghetti monster.

The news he brings me whets my appetite for the most part.

Sometimes it's hard to swallow.

I get my news from the Eye of Altana. Those shady kuluus will have no secrets for me!

Guess my attack wasn't a total failure you came back out of the shadows and made a paragraph post about how awesome you are, only to call me names and try to deflect the obvious creeping you do.

Congratulations you are the winner /cheer ^^

I never said it wasn't flawed.

But it's still a piece of the information puzzle.

I brought it up but I wasn't asking about them. Those are two entirely different discussions that you fused into one.

The first discussion was about you and your views, which you decline to express because you're afraid they'll be picked apart. The second is about objectivity in obtaining information from news media.

Also note that earlier, you didn't say 'information', like you're claiming now. Earlier, you said that the news guides your opinion. There is a difference between giving you information and guiding your opinion.

You do see that, right?


Also

I don't know why I'm so special, but fine. But I expect you to hold up your end of the bargain without diving into any further distractions after that. I get my news online, and it can be found pretty much anywhere. For example, after checking my yahoo email, I head over to their news section and see if there's anything interesting there to read. Most of the time, there'll be 2-3 articles praising Obamacare and 2-3 articles bashing it, so it's a decent mix of ideologies; just stay away from the comment section. Another example would be other political forums. Whenever something happens, people are usually quick to post a new thread about it and provide a link to an article that discusses it. There are other ways, but that's generally it.

Sometimes I make up my own news, then proceed to make it true.

Are you Ihina?

How are the Caits doing?

That's a strange question. But no, definitely not.

Admitting you are the loser goes without saying.

And yet, here you are.

Oh, I thought we were playing that game where you make a statement about somebody and we guess who you are.

Oh, lol. I normally don't do that. Minds games aren't my thing...

Yeah, they do require a lot of thinking.

Hence the sarcasm font was born.

Yes, what, 4th post? On page 25? And yet, here you are, with a post saying nothing on almost every page. Nice try.

Please enlighten us with your non-wisdom on the topic then.

Is it just me or do all conservatives eventually give up trying to argue and resort to trolling for attention after awhile.

Chaosx is literally asking Viciousss to shower him with more attention.

And Liberals laugh them off as ignorant, even if sometimes conservatives have a good point to make, and eventually take the elitist "I know what's best for you" approach to argument.

That's the problem with being a "Group" and not just an individual. You can damn yourself by association.

That has more to do with their anti-intellectual stance that they take up in general. Science stances like evolution, social stances like sex ed, political stances like BENGHZIAI!!!!, etc. I can't speak for everyone, but I try to give credit where credit is due.

You say Anti-Intellectual, I say Conservatives are insanely smart.

Really think about it, how far to the right have they pushed the Democrats by simply forcing the Democrats to fill the "Moderate" void leftover as more republicans go insane/teaparty?

That's some full on Tywin Lannister ***right there, win the war while losing every battle.

You're conflicting two different things here. Republicans are dumb, and that's why they're republicans. Establishment republican politicians are insanely smart. For example, the politicians lay claim to Lincoln because it's both historically accurate and because it gives off a positive, non-racist image. Republican constituents lay claim to Lincoln and think Lincoln would actually be on their side.


I'm still waiting btw, AO.

I'm not a conservative or a liberal. Registered as an Independent. Last election I voted in 2008 I voted for Obama some democrats a bunch of unchallenged republicans and 2 libertarians.

I go based off track record, policy, and take into account general consensus. Also voted against Christie for his first election. Both choices were terrible and even the local newspaper was endorsing the 3rd party.

But go on with your black & white thinking.

I vote for something more interesting than global warming. How about feminism ?

Is feminism the cause of global warming ? If so how can we blame men for the destruction of the Earth.

Why aren't you special...except just because you're a conservative doesn't mean you have to belong to the republican party. Just because you're a liberal doesn't mean you have to belong to the democratic party. Both Bill Oreily and Bill Maher both claim to be independent, but they're both a conservative and liberal respectively.

But go on with your black and white thinking.

What the *** are you even saying? People are defined by their titles first, and actions second?

Establishment republican politicians smrt
Republican constituents dum

How did you not get that from my post?

Probably because I'm not a binary thinker like you.