Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Valefor.Sehachan said: »
Yeah and then you would ask for a source to such bold statements. Like you don't know that wouldn't be the rebuttal..
You're just pretending to not see the issue it seems.
U.S. Climate Has Already Changed, Study Finds
|
U.S. Climate Has Already Changed, Study Finds
You can't cite independent thoughts. Just the place(s) that made you think differently. You're just pretending to not see the issue it seems. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Cerberus.Pleebo said: » I get it. Something like cancer research is more understandable to you. However, what is and isn't true doesn't revolve around what you're able to understand. You've all convinced me. I am a
Valefor.Sehachan said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Valefor.Sehachan said: » Yeah and then you would ask for a source to such bold statements. Like you don't know that wouldn't be the rebuttal.. You're just pretending to not see the issue it seems. Valefor.Sehachan said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Valefor.Sehachan said: » Yeah and then you would ask for a source to such bold statements. Like you don't know that wouldn't be the rebuttal.. You're just pretending to not see the issue it seems. The issue really isn't relevant imo in this case, sure, you got me there. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Just poking holes in people's logic. The issue really isn't relevant imo in this case, sure, you got me there. Except you're not actually doing that. You're selectively ignoring most rebuttals and answering only what you want to answer. When you don't have an actual reply, you just post empty rhetoric.
[+]
Leviathan.Chaosx said: » You've all convinced me. I am a I'd comment further, but you do rather advertise your modus operandi in your username.
[+]
Bismarck.Ihina said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Just poking holes in people's logic. The issue really isn't relevant imo in this case, sure, you got me there. Except you're not actually doing that. You're selectively ignoring most rebuttals and answering only what you want to answer. When you don't have an actual reply, you just post empty rhetoric. Seems very one sided. So I work with that. Shiva.Onorgul said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » You've all convinced me. I am a I'd comment further, but you do rather advertise your modus operandi in your username. Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Shiva.Onorgul said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » You've all convinced me. I am a I'd comment further, but you do rather advertise your modus operandi in your username.
[+]
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Shiva.Onorgul said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » You've all convinced me. I am a I'd comment further, but you do rather advertise your modus operandi in your username. Trying not to break the 4th wall too much though.
Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Why should I when no one answers the most basic questions about the formation of such a conclusion? Unless this is another tide-goes-in, tide-goes-out question, I believe the general idea behind AGW have been explained. I just heard on the news that the antarctic melting is irreversible now, and so is global warming.
Whew, glad we don't need to pour anymore money into it. Can we all loosen up the restrictions on co2 emissions now? I mean its pointless now right?
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » I just heard on the news that the antarctic melting is irreversible now, and so is global warming. Whew, glad we don't need to pour anymore money into it. Can we all loosen up the restrictions on co2 emissions now? I mean its pointless now right?
[+]
Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » I just heard on the news that the antarctic melting is irreversible now, and so is global warming. Whew, glad we don't need to pour anymore money into it. Can we all loosen up the restrictions on co2 emissions now? I mean its pointless now right? Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Can we all loosen up the restrictions on co2 emissions now? I mean its pointless now right? Even if AGW wasn't a thing, I don't particularly enjoy breathing that stuff in. Why are you guys pro-CO2 emissions again? Bismarck.Ihina said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Can we all loosen up the restrictions on co2 emissions now? I mean its pointless now right? Even if AGW wasn't a thing, I don't particularly enjoy breathing that stuff in. Why are you guys pro-CO2 emissions again? I'm pro co2 cause most co2 is emitted in the process of generating power and there is a direct relationship to the amount of power one consumes to their quality of life. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Leviathan.Chaosx said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » I just heard on the news that the antarctic melting is irreversible now, and so is global warming. Whew, glad we don't need to pour anymore money into it. Can we all loosen up the restrictions on co2 emissions now? I mean its pointless now right?
[+]
Bismarck.Ihina said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Can we all loosen up the restrictions on co2 emissions now? I mean its pointless now right? Even if AGW wasn't a thing, I don't particularly enjoy breathing that stuff in. Why are you guys pro-CO2 emissions again? Can't we just let cows fart in peace?
[+]
Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Bismarck.Ihina said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » Can we all loosen up the restrictions on co2 emissions now? I mean its pointless now right? Even if AGW wasn't a thing, I don't particularly enjoy breathing that stuff in. Why are you guys pro-CO2 emissions again? I'm pro co2 cause most co2 is emitted in the process of generating power and there is a direct relationship to the amount of power one consumes to their quality of life. Personally I think it's already bad enough and I don't want to end up like other places where the air pollution is so thick it actually remains visible. So bad that it's recomended that I walk around with a mask on to reduce the negative effects it may have on my body. Ragnarok.Nausi said: » I'm pro co2 cause most co2 is emitted in the process of generating power and there is a direct relationship to the amount of power one consumes to their quality of life. That's actually not a bad way to justify it. So you'd totally be cool with humoring us and cutting CO2 emissions if there are other sources of energy that's cheaper and more efficient? There were various studies that said the ice caps were melting at an alarming rate, and to a degree they were, considering the region. With the global climate in perpetual flux, now there are studies, from many of the same researchers stating that the ice is now forming at an alarming rate.
The general fluctuation (where as we had little knowledge of the ice caps prior) is cause for study. The lack of understanding of the fluctuation is where cause for concern and fear sets in. Even experts in the field aren't quite sure what it means, but they can only go on currently known hypotheticals, unless something happens that causes a drastic change in thinking about it. Then they have to formulate a new theory and explanation based off of the data they've collected and analyze it to use in an experiment, if in fact a reasonable experiment can be conducted at a smaller scale. If it can't be, then they have to use hypothesis, collected data, to show a reasonable explanation as why something is happening. Bismarck.Ihina said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » I'm pro co2 cause most co2 is emitted in the process of generating power and there is a direct relationship to the amount of power one consumes to their quality of life. That's actually not a bad way to justify it. So you'd totally be cool with humoring us and cutting CO2 emissions if there are other sources of energy that's cheaper and more efficient? Bismarck.Ihina said: » Ragnarok.Nausi said: » I'm pro co2 cause most co2 is emitted in the process of generating power and there is a direct relationship to the amount of power one consumes to their quality of life. That's actually not a bad way to justify it. So you'd totally be cool with humoring us and cutting CO2 emissions if there are other sources of energy that's cheaper and as corrected in general terms, sure. So nuclear energy.
Bismarck.Bloodrose said: » There were various studies that said the ice caps were melting at an alarming rate, and to a degree they were, considering the region. With the global climate in perpetual flux, now there are studies, from many of the same researchers stating that the ice is now forming at an alarming rate. The general fluctuation (where as we had little knowledge of the ice caps prior) is cause for study. The lack of understanding of the fluctuation is where cause for concern and fear sets in. Even experts in the field aren't quite sure what it means, but they can only go on currently known hypotheticals, unless something happens that causes a drastic change in thinking about it. Then they have to formulate a new theory and explanation based off of the data they've collected and analyze it to use in an experiment, if in fact a reasonable experiment can be conducted at a smaller scale. If it can't be, then they have to use hypothesis, collected data, to show a reasonable explanation as why something is happening. Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: » So nuclear energy. People claiming the science is settled, and the science being settled are two invariably different things.
But as I pointed out, there has been little evidence to show contrary to humans having and increasingly large effect on the environment, since one of our greatest tools is to manipulate the environment to suit our needs. By doing so, we destroy so that we can create. Essentially humanity is chaos in this sense. Edit: Not everything we create is necessarily a boon, and not everything we destroy is a boon either. Sometimes we create our own disadvantages by ignoring the longterm effects of what we destroy. |
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.