Carbuncle.Maletaru said:
»You ever want a set with TA+34% and DT-35%? Because that seems pretty notable. BiS Meva on (nearly) every single piece, more MDB than Malignance, more accuracy than Malignance, WAY more HP than malignance, and close-enough-to-BiS macc, while still retaining all those defensive stats.
But yeah, they ALSO added enspell damage on there, so it's trash.
Spoiler Alert! Click to view.
Yeah, no ***you have to augment it to get some of those stats...but it's still a dumbass take that adding an extra stat you don't need makes it bad.
I think every set besides the mage set got a pretty decent amount of multi attack and the other sets all get additional melee focused stats like phiscal damage limit, store tp and crit chance on top.
The main critique here is that this set primarily plays into RDMs strengths. RDM simply doesn't need more buffs like this. Out of the jobs on the sworn armor set I'd argue BLU is in the worst spot and would have deserved more attention.
While you can make a argument for putting phalanx on it considering the other perks like FC/-DT and decent defensive stats you still have to admit something other than spell enhancement damage would have fit better and cater more to all jobs on the list.
BLU would have fit just as well on most of the other sets, the only one more disappointing would have been the mage set because it would compete with empy +3.