I have wanted to see that movie. I had one professor who says that such a thing could have been possible, and the other one that demands that Shakespeare was closely documented, and therefore wasn't some concealed aristocrat. I doubt he was, but that would still be super interesting. Also, *** yea, sonnets!
What a *** day. -_-; Had to leave our house to get it sprayed for cockroaches. Then we find out, they're German cockroaches. >.> Which means they're small, breed a lot and are *** hard to get rid of. Then, after we get home :D Our electricity in one of the rooms is *** up. This house is totally not worth it. >:/
I have wanted to see that movie. I had one professor who says that such a thing could have been possible, and the other one that demands that Shakespeare was closely documented, and therefore wasn't some concealed aristocrat. I doubt he was, but that would still be super interesting. Also, *** yea, sonnets!
You can get it on amazon digital video for $10.
Worth it. It is about the Prince Tudor theory of Shakespeare's authenticity.
I have wanted to see that movie. I had one professor who says that such a thing could have been possible, and the other one that demands that Shakespeare was closely documented, and therefore wasn't some concealed aristocrat. I doubt he was, but that would still be super interesting. Also, *** yea, sonnets!
You can get it on amazon digital video for $10.
Worth it. It is about the Prince Tudor theory of Shakespeare's authenticity.
That would explain his penchant for the whole Richard and Henry history. In fact, have you been watching Shakespeare Uncovered on PBS? The other day they had an episode about Henry IV 1&2 and Henry V. I've only read part 1 so far, but it's so epic. Also, a little inaccurate, but still awesome.
I have wanted to see that movie. I had one professor who says that such a thing could have been possible, and the other one that demands that Shakespeare was closely documented, and therefore wasn't some concealed aristocrat. I doubt he was, but that would still be super interesting. Also, *** yea, sonnets!
You can get it on amazon digital video for $10.
Worth it. It is about the Prince Tudor theory of Shakespeare's authenticity.
That would explain his penchant for the whole Richard and Henry history. In fact, have you been watching Shakespeare Uncovered on PBS? The other day they had an episode about Henry IV 1&2 and Henry V. I've only read part 1 so far, but it's so epic. Also, a little inaccurate, but still awesome.
The thing about that theory is, as much as it seems legit, it's still just a theory. So, as much as we suppose, we don't have proof proving for or against it. Y'know, until they develop time travel. Also, the question as to how much of his plays were actually written by him are debatable. There are accounts of him collaborating with other writers. It's nice to contemplate it, though.
There is a part of me that wants to believe he was just as we thought he was: a lyrical genius whose mind was far beyond even by today's standards.
The thing about that theory is, as much as it seems legit, it's still just a theory. So, as much as we suppose, we don't have proof proving for or against it. Y'know, until they develop time travel. Also, the question as to how much of his plays were actually written by him are debatable. There are accounts of him collaborating with other writers. It's nice to contemplate it, though.
There is a part of me that wants to believe he was just as we thought he was: a lyrical genius whose mind was far beyond even by today's standards.
I think he was a genius. Just look at all of the other geniuses in our world's history. History is figurative stuffed with geniuses in each major era of mankind.
The thing about that theory is, as much as it seems legit, it's still just a theory. So, as much as we suppose, we don't have proof proving for or against it. Y'know, until they develop time travel. Also, the question as to how much of his plays were actually written by him are debatable. There are accounts of him collaborating with other writers. It's nice to contemplate it, though.
There is a part of me that wants to believe he was just as we thought he was: a lyrical genius whose mind was far beyond even by today's standards.
I think he was a genius. Just look at all of the other geniuses in our world's history. History is figurative stuffed with geniuses in each major era of mankind.
Well, whoever did write those plays and sonnets was a genius. Who and how many of them there were is the question. The gentlemen who presented the First Folio seemed to state it was one person, but even then we can only take their word.
Just finished watching episode 17 of Little Busters. Now I'm so curious to know what happened I can't even sleep. Have to wait another week for the next episode or play the visual novel.
Also when it comes to sports I'm dumb as bricks. My friend asked me if I wanted to hang out and watch the Super Bowl at his place. He asked me who are you rooting for? I said who is playing? He thought I was joking but I really didn't know. I had no idea who the Ravens are until I googled it. My first thought was dynamis-buburimu.
My conclusion is, I don't care who wins long as I'm drunk and eating lots of hot wings.
This is a thread that I found on another website I post at. It can be really really interesting. I thought it deserved a place here.
Post your random thoughts for the day here, or anything else that intrigues you.
For starters, is it possible to give constructive critism to someone who doesn't have a neck? I totally just walked by a girl who didn't. Someone isn't getting a necklace for Valentines day!
And who decided black and white can't be colors? I want to say a racist. I really do.