Bismarck.Josiahkf said:
»So I wonder who is better between the Knights and Samurai.


Samurai by far I'd wager. wtf is up with that samurai though, he's posing like a 1940's broadway play
I'd actually go against that.
Knights had better armor and better black smiths.
The katana is a very inferior blade in comparison to a European Short sword, long sword or claymore. They weighed way too much and were way too brittle.
Their style of fighting alone would put knights on top. The reason many first think of the Samurai is because much of the Japanese martial arts has been preserved over the centuries where as the European styles have largely been forgotten/cast aside in the face of more modern combat.
Melee vs Melee head to Head clash - European Knight by far.
Pike vs Spear - I'd say Samurai
Melee Combat - Samurai
Horse Combat - I'd say Samurai again just for being more nimble.
Keep in mind Plate armor is very VERY heavy. A full suit of knight plate runs easy 80lbs and restricts your movements greatly.