make it likely for the reader to think that moral implications are a big motivation for responding. Curious how you are gonna explain this.
Not to mention saying that "he also broke ettiquette". Etiquitte = appropriate behaviour. So you believe there is appropriate behaviour for things.
I don't view etiquette as moral. To me the use of etiquette is a behavior that one can choose which leads to certain result. Like when you go to a country with different culture, you follow their etiquette so you become part of the group etc. likewise when you purposely ditch etiquette, you convey your negative emotion to the opposite side. It's a social tool first and foremost.
Rant about specific individual behind their back at its core, it is an action of emotions. You feel good when you do it. That's it. It doesn't even convey the negative emotion to your target because they can't be read by the target. It doesn't serve any other purpose except emotional "feel good".
To me personally, whenever I see someone do this multiple times, my first reaction is always "will they do the same to me?". If you talk bad behind someone's back once, they'll do it second time,third time, and anyone they know can be the next victim. And other people may view such behavior negatively because they may not want to become the next victim.
(Personally, irl I avoid anyone that has such habit so I don't become the next victim)
Additionally, there is also the risk of the listeners are all supporters in the same social circle, created a bubble that prevented the speaker from really seeing the flaws in their actions. Because nobody will point that out due to "etiquette" reasons.
That was the whole logic behind why I said "it is not a good idea". I didn't say nice. "Be Nice" has to produce specific result to have a value. It's not always the best response to every situation.
And you didn't convey that value in your "advice" lol. That's why it's totally unconvincing.
I didn't say you can't offer advice btw, of course you can. I only said purely moral based advice isn't going to work on me.
reader to think that moral implications
I get that many people operate on the basis of moral when they make decisions, especially you. So it's easy to think that way.
Not me though, moral as a concept is rejected by every braincell in me. It's like when vampire touches sun, painful.
Maybe I had moral concept when I was younger, but the influence of such concept got weaker as I got old.
I am surprised that you haven't realize this fact after this many years of moral exchange lol.
I assume you mean by making you closer to adopting the same behaviour?
I view it as a bad idea, why would I want adopt the same behavior under most circumstances? Your assumption is WAY off lol.
unless one's intention was to sound abrasive, which I didn't want to assume)
What's wrong with sounding abrasive though? You haven't give me a reason beyond "be nice". (I know you feel sounding abrasive is wrong, but I don't share such views)
You are free to assume I sound abrasive because I am mean if you wish. Why does it even matter? Why do you keep saying you don't want to assume this way? I just don't understand.
I admitted the first response was an emotional response by nature too. I have higher emotional fluctuation than average, so it's easy to make emotional decisions for me too. But at least the message communicated the negative emotion. and whether the opposite side appreciate the advice or not, and their negative emotional response after that, didn't really affect my mind. So whatever, idc.
And like you said, Vyre is a "good guy" and a mod, so I don't mind backing down. But if you think that's because of "moral", you are damn wrong.