Random Thoughts.....What Are You Thinking?

Eorzea Time
 
 
 
Language: JP EN FR DE
users online
Forum » Everything Else » Undead » Random Thoughts.....What are you thinking?
Random Thoughts.....What are you thinking?
First Page 2 3 ... 17696 17697 17698 ... 22766 22767 22768
 Shiva.Spathaian
Offline
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Spathaian
Posts: 27982
By Shiva.Spathaian 2015-08-19 13:28:50
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bismarck.Dracondria said: »
Make Isack check his PMs, Spath lol
I have no control over Isack. ._.
 Bismarck.Dracondria
Offline
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 33979
By Bismarck.Dracondria 2015-08-19 13:29:26
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Oh maybe you're not on XIV lol
 Shiva.Spathaian
Offline
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Spathaian
Posts: 27982
By Shiva.Spathaian 2015-08-19 13:30:12
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I'm... half on.

He's been informed. Though he may be afk.
 Asura.Ackeronll
Offline
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: Ackeron
Posts: 4307
By Asura.Ackeronll 2015-08-19 13:32:49
Link | Quote | Reply
 
YOU'RE NOT THE BOSS OF ME!
Offline
Posts: 42703
By Jetackuu 2015-08-19 13:33:41
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
I never hacked ROMs, just played the game so I have no experience in that area. As far as just playing the game with near perfect reliability and speed, ZSNES is the way to go. If you do all that other stuff then clearly SNES9X. 100% solid ASM engine took a lot of effort and dedication.

Jetackuu said: »
BSNES
I think I messed around with this one when it first came out.
It's up to par with SNES9X now?

Like I said: ZNES is outdated. BSNES is for those like accuracy above all else, and I'm aware of a few games that require accuracy due to the way they're coded on their timing.

SNES9X is where it's at these days, unless you need one of the others for something it's where it's at.

edit: basically ZSNES is highly inaccurate for an emulator, SNES9x is most of the way (and because you can use it's core, you can actually use a zsnes frontend with the snes9x core and play that way if you prefer the zsnes layout of the gui, similar to how retroarch can use snes9x's core.)

BSNES and Higan are arguably the most accurate, and needed in a few rare instances, I'm sure Leo could say off the top of their head but I'm not sure without looking it up. I do know that ZSNES has issues with a lot of chips, and one of my favorite games: SMRPG.

I have my qualms with retroarch on android though, mostly because I can't (at least at the time I couldn't) set a save/load folder for each core type meaning I'd have to have all of my games in one folder or renavigate each time I wanted to switch between say SNES or PSX, annoying.
 Shiva.Spathaian
Offline
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Spathaian
Posts: 27982
By Shiva.Spathaian 2015-08-19 13:35:51
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Asura.Ackeronll said: »
YOU'RE NOT THE BOSS OF ME!
See, I told ya.
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2015-08-19 14:02:55
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jetackuu said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
I never hacked ROMs, just played the game so I have no experience in that area. As far as just playing the game with near perfect reliability and speed, ZSNES is the way to go. If you do all that other stuff then clearly SNES9X. 100% solid ASM engine took a lot of effort and dedication.

Jetackuu said: »
BSNES
I think I messed around with this one when it first came out.
It's up to par with SNES9X now?

Like I said: ZNES is outdated. BSNES is for those like accuracy above all else, and I'm aware of a few games that require accuracy due to the way they're coded on their timing.

SNES9X is where it's at these days, unless you need one of the others for something it's where it's at.

edit: basically ZSNES is highly inaccurate for an emulator, SNES9x is most of the way (and because you can use it's core, you can actually use a zsnes frontend with the snes9x core and play that way if you prefer the zsnes layout of the gui, similar to how retroarch can use snes9x's core.)

BSNES and Higan are arguably the most accurate, and needed in a few rare instances, I'm sure Leo could say off the top of their head but I'm not sure without looking it up. I do know that ZSNES has issues with a lot of chips, and one of my favorite games: SMRPG.

I have my qualms with retroarch on android though, mostly because I can't (at least at the time I couldn't) set a save/load folder for each core type meaning I'd have to have all of my games in one folder or renavigate each time I wanted to switch between say SNES or PSX, annoying.
I get it, we're not going to agree on ZSNES and the feat that it accomplished.

As for BSNES, so then they definitely improved on it significantly. But still not on par with SNES9X? Is it still active?

Never even heard of Higan. How's that one?
Offline
Posts: 42703
By Jetackuu 2015-08-19 14:06:20
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I wouldn't say "on par" as it tries to accomplish different things.

I'm not disagreeing that ZSNES is fast, it is fast but it's also inaccurate as hell and SNES9X is better on many levels.

As far as I'm aware BSNES is active, don't really use it I just know of it and what it's goal is.

Higan like BSNES strives for accuracy, if my source is accurate it's the only on that can handle certain scan types, aka a few games (would have to look them up and I'm sure they're obscure as hell).

ZSNES was cool like when Nesticle was, and well, lol.

edit: also SNES9X is supposed to have 100% sound accuracy, which ZSNES most certainly does not. For those who like their sound accuracy, that's a big deal.
 Bahamut.Soraishin
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Soraishin
Posts: 1155
By Bahamut.Soraishin 2015-08-19 14:40:14
Link | Quote | Reply
 
[+]
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2015-08-19 14:42:10
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | Quote | Reply
 
Post deleted by User.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2015-08-19 14:48:00
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | Quote | Reply
 
Post deleted by User.
[+]
 leo
Offline
Posts: 2877
By leo 2015-08-19 16:48:16
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jetackuu said: »
I wouldn't say "on par" as it tries to accomplish different things.

I'm not disagreeing that ZSNES is fast, it is fast but it's also inaccurate as hell and SNES9X is better on many levels.

As far as I'm aware BSNES is active, don't really use it I just know of it and what it's goal is.

Higan like BSNES strives for accuracy, if my source is accurate it's the only on that can handle certain scan types, aka a few games (would have to look them up and I'm sure they're obscure as hell).

ZSNES was cool like when Nesticle was, and well, lol.

edit: also SNES9X is supposed to have 100% sound accuracy, which ZSNES most certainly does not. For those who like their sound accuracy, that's a big deal.

Nesticle is bad and should not even be mentioned. Genecyst too. Crappy emulators people used on 486 computers. Seriously. -_-;
[+]
 Sylph.Kyogi
Offline
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
user: Kyogi
Posts: 252
By Sylph.Kyogi 2015-08-19 16:58:44
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bahamut.Soraishin said: »

That was pretty much me in a nutshell, especially when they had double flotsam >w<
 Bismarck.Misao
Offline
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
user: misacat
Posts: 22620
By Bismarck.Misao 2015-08-19 17:13:27
Link | Quote | Reply
 
dafuq is moogle garden

/doesn't really want to know
Offline
Posts: 32551
By Artemicion 2015-08-19 17:18:59
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I forgot how slow ripping lossless can be. Started twenty minutes ago, and only now begun track 3/21 on the first of four discs ._.
 Phoenix.Dabackpack
MSPaint Winner
Offline
Server: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2012
By Phoenix.Dabackpack 2015-08-19 17:29:40
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I got 2 keys for the gobbiebox from accoloades and got

a Deed of Moderation and a Second Virtue, the two pops for Jailer of Justice

think Rewardox is trying to tell me something???
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2015-08-19 17:30:51
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jetackuu said: »
I wouldn't say "on par" as it tries to accomplish different things.

I'm not disagreeing that ZSNES is fast, it is fast but it's also inaccurate as hell and SNES9X is better on many levels.

As far as I'm aware BSNES is active, don't really use it I just know of it and what it's goal is.

Higan like BSNES strives for accuracy, if my source is accurate it's the only on that can handle certain scan types, aka a few games (would have to look them up and I'm sure they're obscure as hell).

ZSNES was cool like when Nesticle was, and well, lol.

edit: also SNES9X is supposed to have 100% sound accuracy, which ZSNES most certainly does not. For those who like their sound accuracy, that's a big deal.
It's a shame that by now all these developers haven't gotten together and made one ultimate emulator for the SNES once and for all. Something in which could be easily ported to any system with minimal modifications in the future.
MSPaint Winner
Offline
Server: Excalibur
Game: FFXIV
user: Leonkasai
Posts: 6368
By Leon Kasai 2015-08-19 17:30:53
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Oh wow. People shitting themselves over the UC 0096 update to MSGO because of stats from *** guidebooks and model kit manuals.
We don't have a single piece of info about the Jesta's cost or how it plays, but because it's model kit says it's generator output is 10,000kw higher than the GM, that totally means it's going to ruin the game and everything everywhere will explode forever.

[+]
Offline
Posts: 32551
By Artemicion 2015-08-19 17:41:33
Link | Quote | Reply
 


If anyone is interested in a copy, PM me.
 leo
Offline
Posts: 2877
By leo 2015-08-19 17:53:27
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Artemicion said: »
I forgot how slow ripping lossless can be. Started twenty minutes ago, and only now begun track 3/21 on the first of four discs ._.

Are you ripping RAW with ECC before converting? :P (RAW with CD error correction data aka BIN/CUE)

Honestly convert something to FLAC from PCM on my PC is almost instantaneous. The only thing that could make it so slow is read a disc at 1X raw. >.>
Offline
Posts: 32551
By Artemicion 2015-08-19 17:58:47
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I have the drive capped at 4x to improve read and write accuracy, and the cd is initially ripped in WAV then subsequently converted into FLAC from my software. The reason why it's so slow is because I have a slow read test to check for errors prior to writing right off the bat.

Also I don't think RAW with ECC would work unless I had buffered RAM right?
 leo
Offline
Posts: 2877
By leo 2015-08-19 18:02:23
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
It's a shame that by now all these developers haven't gotten together and made one ultimate emulator for the SNES once and for all. Something in which could be easily ported to any system with minimal modifications in the future.

Repros, SuperEverDrive, SD2SNES, SNES Power Pack. Pick yet poison.

None of these do SA1 (Mario RPG) or S-DD1 (Star Ocean, Street Fighter Zero/Alpha2) games though...

The best "emulator" is the real thing. :P
 leo
Offline
Posts: 2877
By leo 2015-08-19 18:09:46
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Artemicion said: »
I have the drive capped at 4x to improve read and write accuracy, and the cd is initially ripped in WAV then subsequently converted into FLAC from my software. The reason why it's so slow is because I have a slow read test to check for errors prior to writing right off the bat.

Also I don't think RAW with ECC would work unless I had buffered RAM right?

ECC on optical media has nothing to do with ECC on the computer ram (buffered memory). It's about storing some information so the CD drive can reconstruct the data in case of scratches at the disc surface.

Similar to the buffered memory which has extra ECC data for allowing the computer chipset to repair bit errors on the stored data in case of malfunctions. It's used on critical systems (finances, security, manufacturing and science computers) to protect against loss of data or system crashes.

You only need to care about raw/cooked on disc images if you planned to make copies of the actual CD and if it was a PlayStation game. Music CDs can have special ECC data in them but then it would just be silly protections against copy. ;)

Copying them as WAV is perfectly fine for the purpose of archiving the music for playback on other devices.
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2015-08-19 18:10:53
Link | Quote | Reply
 
leo said: »
None of these do SA1 (Mario RPG)
That's definitely a must to be even considered an ultimate emulator.

Even ZSNES could handle that one... almost :P There was one or two freeze issues if I recall that required a workaround.
Offline
Posts: 32551
By Artemicion 2015-08-19 18:14:26
Link | Quote | Reply
 
leo said: »
Copying them as WAV is perfectly fine for the purpose of archiving the music for playback on other devices.

That's a bingo!
And if I remember correctly, my software has a feature similar to ECC in which it seeks an online database for any data that failed during the ripping process due to errors or minor scratches. Obviously major scratches would prevent any further reading, thus writing forward from that point unless you opt to skip that track(s).
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2015-08-19 18:14:39
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | Quote | Reply
 
Post deleted by User.
[+]
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2015-08-19 18:21:53
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Josiahkf said: »
I would pay good money too, for a solid stable upscaling snes emulator that's plays anything intuitively and they could even charge like 50 cents per game to download for it.

It's too bad the original devs don't take advantage
That would be an awesome idea, although pricing would be more like $50 for the program and $2-$5 for games. They could even allow people to develop new 16 bit games and have free ones with ads, lol.

It has the potential to be a good business idea.
Offline
Posts: 32551
By Artemicion 2015-08-19 18:40:44
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I'm so confused. For some reason, some of these tracks appear to be labeled in Chinese; despite being a Japanese game. I wonder why?
Offline
Posts: 42703
By Jetackuu 2015-08-19 18:47:19
Link | Quote | Reply
 
leo said: »
Nesticle is bad and should not even be mentioned. Genecyst too. Crappy emulators people used on 486 computers. Seriously. -_-;
It was a joke.

leo said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
It's a shame that by now all these developers haven't gotten together and made one ultimate emulator for the SNES once and for all. Something in which could be easily ported to any system with minimal modifications in the future.

Repros, SuperEverDrive, SD2SNES, SNES Power Pack. Pick yet poison.

None of these do SA1 (Mario RPG) or S-DD1 (Star Ocean, Street Fighter Zero/Alpha2) games though...

The best "emulator" is the real thing. :P

Those are flash carts, not emulators...

But while we're on carts there was one that was supposed to do most of those things, but I think the guy got sidetracked, I'll have to find a link to the project later.

Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
That's definitely a must to be even considered an ultimate emulator.

Even ZSNES could handle that one... almost :P There was one or two freeze issues if I recall that required a workaround.

Those aren't emulators, just flash carts.

SNES9X can handle SMRPG.

Artemicion said: »
my software
what are you using?
Offline
Posts: 32551
By Artemicion 2015-08-19 18:52:44
Link | Quote | Reply
 
EAC
First Page 2 3 ... 17696 17697 17698 ... 22766 22767 22768