Anyway, the two need to just block each other, which they have been told to do (both of them) several times.
And that was the conclusion that came from the thread. Without that clear point being shown it was all speculation.
Mods claimed character references, history of posts, etc. User claimed a bias in moderation. Supporters made claims of nepotism. When it was all said and done, everyone found out the problem was they didn't follow through on the agreement which was simply keeping each other blocked. That was the mistake initially made on the part of a mod. They claimed trolling/harassment and a generic agreement. Both parties could easily fall under both categories. However, once everything came to light and viewed by the public, all the claims were mostly dispelled by exactly what happened and the actual agreement that was broken.
Think of it as FFXIAH Court.
Imagine if another user had the same type of thread created for their claims. I'm not going to mention this user, as their BPD is out of control imo, but think about it for a bit and you'll realize who I am talking about.
Hint: They caused a rule change not too long ago on something to with sexual innuendo or something to that effect. Whatever the kids are calling it these days.